Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69500, France
NCT Number: NCT05514457
Dyslexia is first described as a phonological deficit. Several studies report a neurovisual deficit in dyslexics. Some dyslexics have a visual deficit without phonological impairment, others have a pure phonological deficit, and still others have both types of deficits. From this observation the idea emerged to propose specific remediation protocols for people with visual impairments and to assess their effects on reading. At the theoretical level, if visual stimulation is able to improve reading performance, it is the demonstration of the existence of visual origin of dyslexia. At the clinical level, such a result not only opens the prospect of a different and more adapted rehabilitation for these types of dyslexia, but also the prospect, if the visual deficits are pre-existing to the learning of reading, to use them for early diagnosis and management.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me8 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69500, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For the glasses (group 2) : epileptic child are excluded
At the beginning of the study, for baseline condition, children will do 4 tests (visuo-spatial perception test, visual attention span, visual research, phonology tests).
In the first group of the study, the children will do visual research exercises on I pad 10 minutes per day during one month = remediation. They will also do 4 reading aloud tests, once a month, for 3 months. The remediation exercises will be realized during the first, second or third month.
At the beginning of the study, for baseline condition, children will do the 4 tests like group 1.
In the second group of the study, the children will do reading aloud tests, with lamp adjusted with different parameters = remediation (passive visual stimulation of a specific frequency believed to promote visual processing of written symbols).
Time frame: for arm 1: at baseline at 1 month at 2 month at 3 month For arm 2: 4 times in the same day, 4 consecutive reading sessions with a break in-between of minimum 5 minutes
change in reading time
Time frame: for arm 1: at baseline at 1 month at 2 month at 3 month For arm 2: 4 times in the same day, 4 consecutive reading sessions with a break in-between of minimum 5 minutes
change in number of errors
Time frame: one time at baseline
comparisons of score of (lengths, sizes, angles and relative positions within and between objects). Minimum score = 36 and maximum (better) score = 72
Time frame: one time at baseline
number of letters identified in a single ocular fixation (200 ms)
Time frame: one time at baseline
average visual search time of symbols versus colored objects
Time frame: one time at baseline
metaphonology = removal of phonemes. Minimum score = 0 and maximum (better) score = 20
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Other
Acronym: Dyslexie REMED
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06387615
Communication Disorders, Dyslexia
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06592911
Communication Disorders, Dyslexia
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07247253
Communication Disorders, Dyslexia
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06596980
Communication Disorders, Dyslexia
Paris, France
View Trial Details