Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06692361

Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who exhibit suboptimal early response to antidepressant treatment. Additionally, it sought to investigate the impact of FMT on biological indicators, including intestinal microbiota and metabolites, in individuals with MDD

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Wuhu Fourth People's Hospital, Wuhu, Anhui, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of adjunctive FMT in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who show limited response to initial drug therapy.

A total of 600 patients experiencing depressive episodes will be screened, with all receiving escitalopram oxalate for an initial 2-week period. Of these, 214 participants who exhibit suboptimal therapeutic response to early antidepressant treatment will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group or control group.

During the intervention, participants will continue their existing antidepressant regimen and receive a 4-week treatment with either microbiota capsules or placebo. An additional 20-week follow-up assessment will then be conducted to evaluate outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(All 8 criterion are met):

  • Outpatient or inpatient, aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive), regardless of gender;
  • At the start of the screening phase, participants must meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or single-episode MDD;
  • At the start of the screening phase, participants' score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) must be ≥ 17;
  • At the start of the screening phase, participants have not been treated with medication for their current depressive episode;
  • At the start of the screening phase, participants are intended to be treated with a single antidepressant medication, Escitalopram;
  • The HAMD-17 score after two weeks of treatment with the maximum tolerated dose of escitalopram was reduced by less than 20% compared with the HAMD-17 score at screening;
  • Participants must have an education level above primary school and be able to understand the content of the scale;
  • Participants sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

(Exclude if 1 criterion is met):

  • According to DSM-5 criteria, currently or previously diagnosed as bipolar disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, neurocognitive disorder, schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, substance-related and addiction disorders;
  • Accompanied by significant psychotic symptoms (delusions, hallucinations, etc.);
  • The patient currently has severe or unstable central nervous system, cardiovascular, respiratory, liver, kidney, endocrine, blood system or other system diseases, and the researcher believes that the patient is not suitable for inclusion in this study;
  • The patient currently has a serious suicide risk, and the HAMD-17 suicide risk item is ≥3 points;
  • Suffering from inflammation-related diseases;
  • Suffering from gastrointestinal infections, tumors and other structural abnormalities of the digestive system, including but not limited to irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, etc.;
  • Previous history of gastrointestinal surgery;
  • Continuous use of antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics or traditional Chinese medicine products for medical purposes for more than 2 weeks within 3 months before enrollment in the study;
  • Those who are allergic to capsule ingredients and contents;
  • Pregnant or lactating patients;
  • Patients who are unable (such as difficulty swallowing) or unwilling to swallow capsules;
  • Patients who received MECT treatment in the past 6 months.

Treatment and study plan

FMT capsule

Biological

The experimental group will maintain escitalopram treatment and take 1.0 g of FMT capsules orally with breakfast every day for 4 weeks.

Other names: microbiota capsule, FMT

Escitalopram (Lexapro)

Drug

Both the experimental group and the placebo group were treated with the maximum tolerated dose of escitalopram.

Other names: Escitalopram

Corn Starch capsules

Biological

The placebo group will maintain escitalopram treatment and take corn starch capsules 1.0 g orally with breakfast every day for 4 weeks.

Other names: Corn starch

Primary outcomes

  1. The differences in efficacy(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥50%) between the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

    The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HAMD-17) was used to assess the severity of depression in patients. If the HAMD-17 score reduction rate was ≥50%, the treatment was considered effective. 4 weeks after 4-week treatments, the differences in the effective rate of treatment between the two groups will be compared.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

    The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) was used to assess the severity of depression in patients. 4 weeks after 4-week treatments, the differences in complete remission rate (HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups will be compared.

  2. The differences in effective rate(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥50%)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    At the end of 4-week treatments, the differences in effective rate(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥ 50%) between the two groups will be compared.

  3. The differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    At the end of 4-week treatments, the differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups will be compared.

  4. Changes in total score of GAD-7 scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes in the total score of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  5. Changes in total score of QIDS-SR scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Rated(QIDS-SR) is mainly used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It includes 9 symptoms for depression diagnosis. QIDS-SR is very sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms. Changes in the total score of QIDS-SR scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  6. The differences in the reduction scores of the HAMD-17 scale in 4 symptom dimensions

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    The differences in the reduction scores of the HAMD-17 scale in 4 different symptom dimensions at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) was recorded: depression (1/2/3/7/8 items), anxiety (9/10/11/15/17 items), insomnia (4/5/6 items), and somatic (12/13/14/16 items).

  7. Changes in total score of GSRS scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    The investigators will use the 7-level rating version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale(GSRS). Changes in the total score of the GSRS scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  8. Changes in total score of SF-12 scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes in the total score of the Short Form 12 Health Survey(SF-12) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  9. Changes in total score of SDS scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes in the total score of the Sheehan Disability Scale(SDS) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  10. Changes in total score of PDQ-5D scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes in the total score of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire for Depression 5-item(PDQ-5D) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  11. Changes of each subscale of CBCT

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes of each subscale of the Cognitive Behavioral Assessment Tool(CBCT) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  12. Changes of each subscale of CGI

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes of each subscale of the Clinical Global Impressions(CGI) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-weeks treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  13. Changes of each subscale of PSQI

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes of each subscale of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  14. Changes in brain imaging and EEG indicators

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Changes in brain imaging and Electroencephalogram(EEG) indicators at each follow-up time (4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.

  15. Evaluation of the safety of the treatments

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    The investigators will record any adverse events reported by participants, after treatments at each follow-up time (4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments).

Other outcomes

  1. Explore changes in intestinal microbiota and metabolomics indicators related to FMT efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

    Explore the changes in biological indicators at each follow-up time (0, 4, 8, and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments):

    • Blood test: 1 procoagulant tube (5 ml), 1 PAXgene RNA collection tube (2.5 ml), 2 EDTA anticoagulant tubes (6 ml/tube);
    • Urine test: 1 urine cup (40 ml);
    • Feces test: 4 sets of feces samples and 2/3 of the 15 ml feces tube are used for microbiome, metabolome, proteome, transcriptome, epigenome and other omics detection and analysis.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Gang Wang

CONTACT

86 + 010-86430066

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gang Wang

Other

Collaborators

  • First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
  • Shandong Daizhuang Hospital
  • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
  • Tianjin Anding Hospital
  • West China Hospital
  • Wuhu Fourth People's Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Effectiveness and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Do Not Show Early Improvement Following Antidepressant Treatment: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 2, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.