Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu, 42472, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT06015204
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of photoplethysmographic amplitude in assessing the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB). The main question it aims to answer is
* Is there any difference in the post-block changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the ipsilateral 5th finger (supplied by the 8th cervical nerve root) between ISBPBs targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots and the C5-to-C8 nerve roots? * Do the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude represent the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome? Participants will receive either ISBPB targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots or the C5-to-C8 nerve roots, and then the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude will be measured from the 5th finger ipsilateral to ISBPB.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Daegu, 42472, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C6 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).
With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C8 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.
Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).
Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.
Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.
Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.
Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.
Time frame: 1 minute before the surgical incision
The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).
Time frame: An average of 1 hour after the introduction of a block needle
The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).
Time frame: 1 minute after surgical incision
The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).
Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Accidental puncture of the common carotid, subclavian, or vertebral artery, pneumo/hemothorax, epidural or intrathecal injection of local anesthetic, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and other neurological complications
Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff
Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff
Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle
Measured from electrocardiogram
Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle
Measured from electrocardiogram
JongHae Kim
Other
Objective Assessment of Extent of Anesthesia in the 8th Cervical Dermatome Using Photoplethysmographic Amplitude in Patients Undergoing Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07625787
Arm Injuries, Brachial Plexus Block
Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT06381622
Anesthesia, Local, Brachial Plexus Block
Hillerød, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05767827
Brachial Plexus Block, Local Anesthesia Adjuvants
Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT05005260
Agnosia, Brachial Plexus Block
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details