Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01444456

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia

This is a multicenter, international, prospective, observational study of patients who are receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumour cancers (breast, colorectal, ovarian, prostate, lung, bladder, endometrial, renal, pancreatic, esophageal or gastric) and who are receiving darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or other erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anaemia.

Quality of Life will be assessed electronically with the aim of estimating improvement in quality of life for those patients receiving darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) who also have an increase in haemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1 g/dL

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Research Site, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Before enrolling participants, each country was assigned to either cohort 1 (patients receiving only darbepoetin alfa) or cohort 2 (patients receiving any ESA). Cohort 2 was assigned only to those countries in which local regulations did not permit observational study participation by patients receiving a specific agent in a drug class.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with breast, colorectal, ovarian, prostate, lung, bladder, endometrial, renal, pancreatic, esophageal or gastric cancer
  • Expected to receive at least 8 additional weeks of a given regimen of myelosuppressive chemotherapy after enrolment
  • Starting treatment with either darbepoetin alfa (in Cohort 1 countries) or any ESA (in Cohort 2 countries) as per European Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) for symptomatic anaemia.

Exclusion criteria

  • Received any ESA treatment or Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion within 28 days prior to enrolment
  • Known primary benign or malignant haematologic disorder which can cause anaemia
  • Known hypersensitivity to ESAs

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Receiving Darbepoetin Alfa With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 9 (Treatment Day 57). Due to the observational nature of the study and variation in ESA dosing schedules, assessments closest to day 57 and within Days 43 to 70 (inclusive) were used to calculate the Week 9 visit results.

    Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at Week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference [MID]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 9

    Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference [MID]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in FACT-F Score for Participants With a VAS Improvement of 5 ± 3 Points

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 9

    The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items (statements) that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants are asked to indicate how they feel in response to each of the 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale can range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. A positive change (>0) from baseline score constitutes an improvement in fatigue between Baseline and Week 9. The fatigue-visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100-point scale where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

  3. Time to First Increase in Hemoglobin

    Time frame: From Baseline until Week 9

    Time from Baseline to first increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1 g/dL

  4. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient-perceived Fatigue (PPF) at Any Time

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 13

    The percentage of participants with iimprovement in PPF at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13). Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference [MID]). The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the FACT-An questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

  5. Percentage of Participants With Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL at Any Time

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 13

    The percentage of participants with increase in hemoglobin (≥ 1 g/dL) at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Electronic Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia: An International Prospective Observational Study (eAQUA)

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
First posted
Sep 30, 2011
Registry last updated
Mar 20, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.