ocriplasmin
Drug0.5 mg/0.2 mL solution for injection
Other names: JETREA®
NCT Number: NCT02035748
The purpose of this study is to observe the anatomical and functional outcomes of ocriplasmin (JETREA®) over a 6-month follow-up period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
After receiving a single intravitreal injection as per country's product label (Day 0), subjects were followed for a 6-month period (Day 180).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
0.5 mg/0.2 mL solution for injection
Other names: JETREA®
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28
Vitreous separation was assessed by SD-OCT using scores ranging from 1 (vitreous attached from macula to ON; separated elsewhere cannot determine foveal) to 12 (unable to determine state of separation). Nonsurgical resolution was defined as a change from baseline score of 5/6/8 to 7/9/10 at Day 28. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. Thus, the term VMA is used interchangeably with VMT/sVMA. Proportion of subjects is presented as a percentage, with percentage based on the number of subjects who have VMT/sVMA at baseline and SD-OCT value at Day 28. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
BCVA (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing at 4 meters. The charts contain 14 rows of letters. BCVA was calculated as the number of letters read correctly and improvement defined as an increase (gain) in letters read from the baseline assessment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Day 28, Day 90, Day 180
The closure of macular hole (a full thickness defect of the retinal tissue involving the anatomical fovea) is defined as a flattened and reattached hole rim along the whole circumference of macular hole. Closure was determined by SD-OCT evaluation and the percentage of subjects tabulated. Proportion of subjects is presented as a percentage, with percentage based on the number of subjects who had macular hole at baseline and OCT value at each specific visit. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90, Day 180
Vitreous separation was assessed by SD-OCT using scores ranging from 1 (vitreous attached from macula to ON; separated elsewhere cannot determine foveal) to 12 (unable to determine state of separation). Nonsurgical resolution was defined as a change from baseline score of 5/6/8 to 7/9/10 at Day 90 and Day 180. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. Thus, the term VMA is used interchangeably with VMT/sVMA. Proportion of subjects is presented as a percentage, with percentage based on the number of subjects who have VMT/sVMA at baseline and SD-OCT value at Day 90/Day 180. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Day 180
Pars plana vitrectomy (the surgical removal of vitreous gel from the eye) was captured in Concomitant Ocular Procedures. Proportion of subjects is reported as a percentage. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 180
Nonsurgical change in central foveal thickness (CFT values after a vitrectomy were imputed with the last non-missing value prior to the vitrectomy) was determined by subtracting the measurements in subretinal fluid and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) elevations and/or SHRM (subretinal hyper-reflective material, such as choroidal neovascularization (CNV)) from the value in total retinal measurement. A lower CFT indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Alcon Research
Industry
Assessment of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Treated With Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMT/sVMA)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02322229
Vitreomacular Adhesion, Vitreomacular Traction
New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT01966328
Vitreomacular Adhesion, Vitreomacular Attachment
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05860985
Epiretinal Membrane, Eye Diseases
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06038968
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details