Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05247294

Assessment of Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease With Sensor-based Home Monitoring

The aim of this study is to implement home-based monitoring (HBM) using remote-capture wearable devices and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a rather homogeneous subgroup of advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, suffering from significant motor fluctuations (MF) and Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), over a two-week period.

The investigators aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of patient symptoms, severity, and fluctuations and compare these data to interview-derived clinical data.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Movement Disorders Institution, Sheba Medical Center

Ramat Gan, Israel

About this study

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neuro-degenerative disorder affecting millions of people worldwide. PD is associated with both motor and non-motor symptoms that affect patients' functioning and Quality of life.

The motor symptoms consist of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and gait impairments. Additional important motor symptoms that are associated with chronic Levodopa therapy, are levodopa-induced dyskinesia and motor fluctuations.

Currently, the accepted clinical measurement of PD symptom severity is the Movement Disorders Society-unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS), which is based, in part, on subjective and potentially recall-based reports by the patients and on semi-objective observations by the clinician.

On average, PD patients see their treating neurologist for in-clinic visits twice a year. These visits are limited in time and may leave some issues unattended regarding all aspects of disease and overall health. This may adversely affect the decision making process and the prescribed treatment plan.

In order to understand the accurate clinical status of patients, particularly in the motor fluctuating stage of PD and to monitor results of intervention, the treating neurologist may need a more comprehensive picture of their patients' symptoms and lives during protracted periods and real life in their home environment.

The HBM apparatus used in this study will consist of a smartwatch (Apple watch) and a smartphone (Apple iPhone 8). The phone is pre-installed with an application which is part of the Intel® Pharma Analytics Platform. The mobile app was designed by usability experts and was tested with patients to ensure ease of use by an elderly population with PD.

The Intel platform is enhanced by a compendium of algorithms to extract clinical insights from the raw sensor data. Passive sensor data is transferred from the study smartwatch. The data includes three measures based on the smartwatch data: activity level, dyskinesia and tremor.

The study will be conducted at Movement Disorders Institute at Sheba Medical Center and will include two clinic visits and a 2-week HBM phase.

The first clinic visit as well as the 2-week home period will include the following daily assessments (once in "off" state and once in "on" state):

  • 3- meter Timed up and go test (3mTUG)
  • Finger tapping on smartphone (10 seconds, both hands)
  • Hand tremor assessment: postural tremor (outstretched, 30 sec), rest tremor (30 sec)
  • Pronation-supination

In addition, ePROs are captured with electronic home diaries. Participants will report the severity of PD symptoms they are experiencing on a 5-point scale throughout the day. For the duration of waking hours, participants will receive a notification on their phone to input information about their ON/OFF state every 30 minutes.

The primary objective is to correlate severity of fluctuating motor symptoms in PD patients using the Intel® Pharma Analytics Platform's derived passive sensor data (percentage of daily tremor time and percentage of daily dyskinesia time, percentage of daily "inactivity") in an exploratory manner with concomitant assessment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia using the application's based electronic symptom diary and data of tremor, off time and dyskinesia using the MDS-UPDRS scale.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 5 years
  • Males or females over the age of 30
  • Patients treated with oral levodopa (3 daily doses or more), reporting motor fluctuations and (preferably) with l-dopa-induced dyskinesia
  • UPDRS-MDS 4.4 functional impact of fluctuations (mild + severe, 2-4)
  • Hoehn &Yahr stage 1-3 while ON
  • Ability to operate smartphone technology in the household
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score >20

Exclusion criteria

  • Cognitive or psychiatric impairment that would preclude study participation as determined by the principal investigator
  • Additional major comorbidities
  • Levodopa-resistant tremor (tremor during ON)
  • Levodopa-resistant freezing (freezing during ON)
  • Previous surgical treatment for PD

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between sensor data and MDS-UPDRS data

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    To correlate severity of fluctuating motor symptoms in PD patients using Intel® Pharma Analytics Platform's derived passive sensor data (percentage of daily tremor time and percentage of daily dyskinesia time, percentage of daily "inactivity") in an exploratory manner with concomitant assessment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia using the application's based electronic symptom diary and data of tremor, off time and dyskinesia using the MDS-UPDRS.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between passive sensor data and PDQ-39 questionnaire

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    Correlate the results of passive sensor data regarding "level of activity" and "time of activity" with measures of Quality of life as captured by the PDQ-39

  2. Correlation between passive sensor data and electronic home diaries

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    Correlate the results passive sensor data of "level of activity" and "time of activity" with "on" and "off" data obtained from electronic home diary (on the same days).

  3. Correlation between motor test results (TUG, Static postural tests and finger tapping,) and relevant MDS-UPDRS items

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    Correlate the results of guided structured motor tests (TUG, Static postural tests and finger tapping,) during "off" and during "on" performed in the clinic (visit 1) and at home (twice in each condition) with the results of in-clinic MDS-UPDRS items: 3.1 walking, 3.11 freezing of gait, 3.12 postural stability, 3.4 finger taps during "off" and during "on"

  4. Assessing compliance of PD patients using wearable devices and adherence to assessment protocol.

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    The measures consist of: overall use of watch, Diary report -delay, Number of skipped daily questionnaires, number of skipped assessments, number of skipped medication reports, number of delayed medication reports, number of skipped medications intake, delay in medication intake and more.

  5. Correlation between medication regimen as prescribed by neurologist and patient adherence in real life

    Time frame: 2-3 weeks study period

    To correlate medication regimen as prescribed by neurologist and patient adherence in real life, using electronic medication intake reporting

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sheba Medical Center

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • AbbVie
  • Intel Electronics Ltd.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.