Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00753545

Assessment of Efficacy of AZD2281 in Platinum Sensitive Relapsed Serous Ovarian Cancer

The primary purpose of this study to determine if AZD2281 is effective and well tolerated in maintaining the improvement in your cancer after previous platinum-based chemotherapy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients with histologically diagnosed serous ovarian cancer or recurrent serous ovarian cancer.
  • Patients must have completed at least 2 previous courses of platinum containing therapy; the patient must have been platinum sensitive to the penultimate chemo regimen.
  • For the last chemotherapy course prior to enrolment on the study, patients must have demonstrated an objective stable maintained response (partial or complete response) and this response needs to be maintained until completion of chemotherapy.
  • Patients must be treated on the study within 8 wks of completion of their final dose of the platinum containing regimen.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous treatment with PARP inhibitors including AZD2281
  • Patients with low grade ovarian carcinoma.
  • Patients who have had drainage of their ascites during the final 2 cycles of their last chemotherapy regimen prior to enrolment on the study
  • Patients receiving any chemotherapy, radiotherapy (except for palliative reasons), within 2 weeks from the last dose prior to study entry (or a longer period depending on the defined characteristics of the agents used).

Treatment and study plan

AZD2281

Drug

Tablets Oral BID

Other names: Olaparib, Lynparza

Matching Placebo

Drug

matching placebo bid

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) (According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST])

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    PFS was defined as the time from randomisation to the earlier date of radiological progression (per RECIST criteria) or death by any cause in the absence of objective progression. [Full analysis set (FAS)]

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Follow up every 12 weeks post progression, assessed maximum up to 90 months.

    OS = time from randomisation to date of death from any cause. Patients who had not died at time of analysis were censored at last date patient was known to be alive.

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) (According to RECIST)

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    For each treatment group, the ORR was the number of Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) divided by the number of patients in the group in the FAS with measurable disease at baseline (displayed as a percentage below). Evaluable for response set

  3. Disease Control Rate

    Time frame: Assessed at 24 weeks. Radiologic scans performed at baseline, week 12 (+/- 1 week) and week 24 (+/- 1 week).

    Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of patients who have at least 1 confirmed visit response of CR or PR or have demonstrated SD or NED for at least 23 weeks (ie, 24 weeks +/- 1 week) prior to any evidence of progression. [FAS]

  4. Duration of Response

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    Duration of response = time from assessment prior to timepoint where PR or CR confirmed (i.e. initial assessment of PR/CR), until earliest date of objective progression or death. [Responding patients only]. There were insufficient responses to enable conclusions to be drawn.

  5. Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at Week 24

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/-1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    Percentage change from baseline to Week 24 in target tumour size.

  6. Best Percentage Change in Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) Levels

    Time frame: CA-125 was measured at baseline then every 28 days on treatment, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    Best percentage change from baseline in CA-125 level

  7. Best Objective Response

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/- 1 week) thereafter, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    Best overall response from radiologic assessments. [FAS]

  8. RECIST and CA-125 Response Separately and Combined

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/- 1 week) thereafter and monthly for CA-125 measurements, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    RECIST and CA-125 response separately and combined [Patients evaluable for either CA-125 response or RECIST response]

  9. Time to Earlier of CA-125 or RECIST Progression

    Time frame: Radiologic scans performed at baseline then every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) for the first 60 weeks, then every 24 weeks (+/- 1 week) thereafter and monthly for CA-125 measurements, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    Time from randomisation to the earlier date of radiological progression (per RECIST criteria) or CA-125 or death by any cause in the absence of objective progression. [FAS]

  10. Improvement Rate for FACT-O Symptom Index (FOSI)

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The percentage of patients with an improvement in FOSI. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +3. [Evaluable for FOSI set]

  11. Improvement Rate for Trial Outcome Index (TOI)

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The percentage of patients with an improvement in TOI. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +7. [Evaluable for TOI set]

  12. Improvement Rate for Total Functional Analysis of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O)

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The percentage of patients with an improvement in total FACT-O. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +9. [Evaluable for FACT-O set]

  13. FACT-O Symptom Index (FOSI) Time to Worsening

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The time to worsening was compared between treatments for each of the TOI, FOSI and total FACT-O. [Evaluable for FOSI set]

  14. Trial Outcome Index(TOI)Time to Worsening

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The time to worsening was compared between treatments for each of the TOI, FOSI and total FACT-O. [Evaluable for TOI set]

  15. Functional Analysis of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O) Time to Worsening

    Time frame: Patient reported outcome questionnaire completed at baseline then every 28 days up to disease progression, assessed maximum up to 14 months.

    The time to worsening was compared between treatments for each of the TOI, FOSI and total FACT-O. [Evaluable for FACT-O set]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Phase II Randomised, Double Blind, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy of AZD2281 in the Treatment of Patients With Platinum Sensitive Relapsed Serous Ovarian Cancer Following Treatment With Two or More Platinum Containing Regimens

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 16, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.