Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03273322

Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban In Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Evaluation of 2 doses of rivaroxaban (10 and 15 mg) compared to dual anti platelet therapy (aspirin+clopidogrel) after left atrial appendage closure. The patients will be assessed at 10 and 90 days: central laboratory hemostasis analysis and clinical events assessment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Institut de Cardiologie - Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière

Paris, 75013, France

About this study

Data on antithrombotic therapy after Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) are scarce and no randomized evaluation has been performed to demonstrate what is the best antithrombotic strategy following LAAC. LAAC is classically associated with a 6-week period of anticoagulation with warfarin + aspirin followed by once daily clopidogrel (75 mg) + aspirin (81-325 mg) until the 6 months visit, then aspirin alone is continued indefinitely, as tested in patients without contraindication for anticoagulation in the pivotal Watchman trials. LAAC is mostly used in Europe as an alternative to warfarin anticoagulation when patients have a contraindication to or are unsuitable for warfarin anticoagulation. The classic regimen is not applicable and believed to be too risky in such frail patients. These patients usually receive a regimen of daily clopidogrel + aspirin followed by single antiplatelet therapy (most frequently used treatment). Some patients receive oral anticoagulation without aspirin, including NOAC anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a tempting strategy for anticoagulation following LAAC in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The dose needs first to be carefully evaluated the trial propose a dose ranging study in patients who have undergone successful LAAC.

The study will evaluate two different Rivaroxaban regimen (10 or 15 mg a day) in comparison to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin+clopidogrel : control arm representing standard of care) after successful LAAC. The aim is to investigate whether rivaroxaban could provide correct anticoagulation levels and adequately suppress coagulation activation after LAAC.

The patient will be enrolled after left atrial appendage closure before discharge. The randomization is 1/1/1 between the 3 groups : rivaroxaban 10mg a day, rivaroxaban 15 mg a day and aspirin 75mg + clopidogrel 75 mg a day. At 10 and 90 days, the patients will be sampled for biological assessment : Prothrombin fragments 1+2, Factor Xa inhibitory activity, Russel Viper venom enzyme assay, thrombin anti-thrombin (TAT) complex, D-Dimers, Prothrombin time (Neoplastin) and plasma von Willebrand factor (vWf) Ag level

After 90 days, the patient will end his/her participation in the trial. Clinical endpoints (death, MI, Stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, extracranial major bleeding or clinically relevant non major bleeding) at 90 days will be assessed by a clinical endpoint committee. Central echographic laboratory will review all 90 days transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to detect the presence of thrombus or peri-device leak.

The study is open-label. Central laboratory, clinical endpoint committee and echographic core laboratory is blinded to randomization arm.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women ≥18 years of age
  • Patients who underwent a clinically successful LAAC procedure (device implanted without procedural or bleeding complication). LAAC may have been indicated for patients contraindicated or unsuitable for long-term Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) anticoagulation.
  • AF (permanent or persistent or paroxysmal) patients irrespective of prior antithrombotic treatment are eligible for randomization.
  • Written informed consent by the patient or designee if the patient is unable to consent
  • Patients affiliated to the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

  • Creatinine clearance <30 mL / min (Cockcroft formula).
  • Dialysis.
  • Mechanical heart valves or valvular disease requiring surgery or interventional procedure
  • Planned Ablation of AF during follow up period
  • Mandatory indication for dual antiplatelet therapy (e.g. recent stent) or single anti-platelet treatment (SAPT) (e.g. high coronary risk).
  • Any contra-indication or known allergy to aspirin or clopidogrel or rivaroxaban.
  • Any mandatory indication for anticoagulation for a reason other than AF (e.g. Pulmonary embolism)
  • Ongoing major bleeding or complicated or recent (<72hours) major surgery
  • Known large oesophageal varices or decompensated liver disease (unless a documented positive opinion of a gastro-enterologist)
  • Severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/ml) after referral to haematologist to confirm or not contraindication
  • Recent myocardial infarction (<6 weeks).
  • Recent cerebro-vascular event (CVE) or transient ischemic attack (<6 weeks) after evaluation of stroke vs bleeding risk by the referring neurologist.
  • Recent Intracranial bleeding (< 6 months): these patients will be evaluated by a neurologist as these patients may be considered at higher stroke risk. Neurologist may consider that the LAAC procedure with a short (90 days) period of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as tested in the protocol is a preferable option (in that case intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) will not be considered as a contraindication).
  • Prasugrel or ticagrelor concomitant use
  • Participating in an investigational drug or another device trial within the previous 30 days.
  • High likelihood of being unavailable for follow-up or psycho-social condition making study participation impractical.
  • Woman with child bearing potential who do not use an efficient method of contraception.
  • positive serum or urine pregnancy test for woman with child bearing potential
  • Pregnancy or within 48 hours post-partum or breast feeding women
  • Patient under legal protection

Treatment and study plan

Rivaroxaban 10 mg qd

Drug

10mg qd

Other names: Experimental

Rivaroxaban 15 mg qd

Drug

15mg qd

Other names: Experimental

DAPT

Drug

Aspirin 75 mg qd + Clopidogrel 75 mg qd

Other names: Active comparator

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2

    Time frame: at Day 10

    Measure of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 at Day 10 (2 to 4 hours after last intake : concentration peak)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measure of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Measure of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 at Day 90 (2 to 4 hours after last intake : concentration peak)

  2. Factor Xa inhibitory activity at day 10

    Time frame: at Day 10

    Factor Xa inhibitory activity

  3. Factor Xa inhibitory activity at day 90

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Factor Xa inhibitory activity

  4. Russel Viper venom enzyme assay

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Russel Viper venom enzyme assay

  5. TAT complex

    Time frame: at Day 10

    TAT complex

  6. TAT complex

    Time frame: at Day 90

    TAT complex

  7. D-Dimers

    Time frame: at Day 10

    D-Dimersand at peak, 2 to 4 hours after treatment intake

  8. D-Dimers

    Time frame: at Day 90

    D-Dimersand at peak, 2 to 4 hours after treatment intake

  9. Prothrombin time (Neoplastin)

    Time frame: at Day 10

    Prothrombin time (Neoplastin)

  10. Prothrombin time (Neoplastin)

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Prothrombin time (Neoplastin)

  11. Plasma vWf Ag level

    Time frame: at Day 10

    plasma vWf Ag level treatment intake

  12. Plasma vWf Ag level

    Time frame: at Day 90

    plasma vWf Ag level treatment intake

  13. Haemorrhagic stroke and bleeding will be safety outcomes TEE with central core lab reading: presence of thrombus, peri-device leak

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Haemorrhagic stroke and bleeding will be safety outcomes 3-month TEE with central core lab reading: presence of thrombus, peri-device leak

  14. Composite clinical endpoint combining all clinical outcomes

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Composite clinical endpoint combining all clinical outcomes : Death, MI, stroke, TIA,

  15. Death (any cause)

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Death (any cause) assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

  16. Myocardial infarction (MI)

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Myocardial infarction (MI) assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

  17. Stroke (ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke)

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Stroke (ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke) assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

  18. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

  19. Systemic embolism

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Systemic embolism assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

  20. Extracranial major bleeding or clinically relevant non major bleeding (ISTH definition) at day 90

    Time frame: at Day 90

    Extracranial major bleeding or clinically relevant non major bleeding (ISTH definition) assessed individually and combined at other outcomes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • Action Research Group
  • Bayer

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban In Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Randomized ADRIFT Study

Acronym: ADRIFT

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 21, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.