Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07321405

Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients

The aim of this research is to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output and stroke volume in patients with septic shock, to evaluate the potential of EC as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, 71511, Egypt

About this study

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection, leading to organ dysfunction. It remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, often progressing rapidly to septic shock and multi-organ failure if not promptly diagnosed and treated.

The complex pathophysiology involves systemic inflammation, endothelial damage, and impaired tissue perfusion, making early recognition and hemodynamic stabilization vital for survival. Accurate monitoring of cardiac function plays a key role in managing septic patients.

Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) are key hemodynamic parameters guiding therapy in critically ill patients, particularly those with pneumonia and septic shock, who experience severe circulatory and respiratory dysfunction contributing to their high mortality.

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors.

Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation.

Currently, hemodynamic monitoring mainly relies on clinical assessment combined with intermittent TTE, with invasive methods reserved for selective cases; EC holds potential as a simpler, safer alternative warranting further investigation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

patients aged more than 18 years must be diagnosed with septic shock following the surviving sepsis campaign

-

Exclusion criteria

  • patients aged less than 18 years pregnant women cases suffering cardiac diseases (heart failure, arrhythmia, moderate, and severe valvular disease) patients with poor quality echocardiographic images and measurements

Treatment and study plan

echocardiogram

Device

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors.

Electrical cardiometry

Device

Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation.

Primary outcomes

  1. to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.

    Time frame: 2026-2028

    to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.

  2. cardiac output and stroke volume in septic shock patients

    Time frame: baseline

    comparison between accuracy and reliability in assessment of cardiac out put and stroke volume using echocardiogram vs electrical cardiometer

  3. to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.

    Time frame: 2026-2028

    to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Osman khalaf, bachelor

CONTACT

[email protected]

01098360564

osman khalaf, resident

CONTACT

01098360564

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assiut University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Non Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.