Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02325258

Assessment of a Proposed Microbiological Alert and Its Impact on a Sepsis Campaign

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of health-care professionals in addressing sepsis, and the impact of a telephone call upon receival of blood cultures in the clinical microbiology department, from a clinical microbiologist, in the early management of sepsis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Servicio de Microbiologia y Enfermedades Infecciosas

Madrid, 28007, Spain

About this study

Sepsis is one of the major challenges of modern medicine. It is an important health problem with a high incidence, morbidity and mortality that affects population worldwide. Without an early recognition and a prompt management, patients can develop more severe stages of the disease and even death. An appropriate and aggressive management can significantly improve outcomes. Thus, it is necessary to develop early warning systems of sepsis in the hospital.

In recent years, several campaigns and guidelines have been developed to help health care professionals in the management of sepsis. However, these have mainly focused on management protocols for severe sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units or emergency departments. To the best of the investigators knowledge, none of these have examined in depth either the impact of a sepsis alert system in general wards, nor the impact of a telephone call from a specialist in Clinical Microbiology, upon blood culture request, in the early recognition of sepsis.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of health-care professionals in addressing sepsis, and the impact of a telephone call upon receival of blood cultures in the clinical microbiology department, from a clinical microbiologist, in the early management of sepsis.

For this, the investigators performed a prospective study based on telephone calls followed by a phone interview to physicians and nurses in charge of patients whose blood cultures had just been received at the clinical microbiology department in a tertiary hospital.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

In-patients with blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology laboratory, regardless of patient allocation (eg., emergency department, intensive care units, general wards)

Opportunity sampling: patients whose clinical history number ended in odd numbers were assigned to group A (intervention) and patients whose clinical history number ended in even numbers were assigned to group B (no intervention, control group).

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who had blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology Laboratory, during the morning shift (from 9 am to 3 pm, Monday to Friday)
  • Patients >/=18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients <18 years old
  • Patients with a recent bacteremic episode with no subsequent negative blood cultures
  • In-patients with blood cultures drawn to whom the telephone call had already been performed.

Treatment and study plan

Telephone Call

Other

Aug-Dec 2012. Prospective study in patients who had blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology Lab during the morning shift (9 am to 3 pm, Mon- Fri) to evaluate sepsis recognition. The investigators allocated 300 patients to 2 groups of 150 patients each, by opportunity sampling: patients whose clinical history number ended in odd numbers were assigned to group A (intervention) and those whose clinical history number ended in even numbers were assigned to group B (no intervention, control group). For patients in group A, the investigators attempted a telephone contact with the physician and/or nurse in charge and an interview, issuing recommendations regarding the convenience of further biochemical, microbiological or extra radiologic tests, and management and antimicrobial therapy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Sepsis recognition in patients who had blood cultures drawn

    Time frame: 72 h

    Use of diagnostic resources and antimicrobial consumption

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health care professionals who correctly identify a case of sepsis

    Time frame: 72 h

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Emilio Bouza

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Dec 24, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 30, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.