Contact Alcon Call Center For Trial Locations
Fort Worth, Texas, 76134, United States
NCT Number: NCT01119287
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Maxidex and Patanol compared to placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis when exposed to controlled allergen levels in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Fort Worth, Texas, 76134, United States
This study consisted of 6 visits. Visit 1 was the Medical Screening Visit (skin prick test). Visit 2 and Visit 3 consisted of 2 consecutive EEC Visits (3 hours in the EEC followed by 7 hours in the Clinic, 10 hours total, each visit) followed by 7 days of wash-out. Visit 2 and Visit 3 occurred prior to dispense and the measures obtained during these visits were used as baseline. At Visit 4 patients were randomized and dispensed the assigned study medication for 7 days of at-home dosing. Visit 5 (Day 8 of treatment) and Visit 6 (Day 9 of treatment) consisted of 2 additional consecutive EEC Visits (3 hours in the EEC followed by 7 hours in the clinic, 10 hours total, each visit). During each EEC visit, patients were exposed to either ragweed or cat allergen, depending on their skin prick test results. Of the 180 participants enrolled, 170 received at least one dose of study treatment and were randomized to one of the three study treatments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Maxidex
Patanol
Tears Naturale II
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, pre-treatment); Visit 6 (Day 9 of treatment)
Ocular redness ratings were collected for nasal and temporal areas of each eye and scored on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extremely severe), 0.5 unit steps permitted. The AUC computation was based on peak redness score (maximum of four areas of redness) at each time point (pre-treatment, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3 hours in the EEC and 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 hours in the Clinic). The patient was dosed AM 30 minutes prior to entering the EEC (Visit 6). This outcome measure evaluates a late-phase effect, for which Maxidex vs. Placebo is the meaningful comparison.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2, pre-treatment), Visit 5 (Day 8 of treatment)
Ocular itching was scored a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (incapacitating itch with irresistible urge to rub) in 0.5 unit steps. The AUC computation was based on the score at each time point (pre-treatment, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3 hours in the EEC). The patient was dosed AM 30 minutes prior to entering the EEC (Visit 5). This outcome measure evaluates an early-phase effect, for which Patanol vs. Placebo is the meaningful comparison.
Alcon Research
Industry
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Maxidex® (0.1% Dexamethasone) Ophthalmic Suspension and Patanol® (0.1% Olopatadine Hydrochloride) Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01471184
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Allergic Rhinitis
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04532710
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Allergic Rhinitis
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04641130
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Strasbourg, Grand Est, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01346371
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details