Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidade
Lisbon, Portugal
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, MD PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06307184
This study will assess the convenience of the natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer (NPP-FET) in terms of number of number of appointments needed before cycle scheduling.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–49 year
Female
Observational
Lisbon, Portugal
Location status: Recruiting
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, MD PhD
CONTACT
Frozen embryo transfer (FET) is increasingly used nowadays in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) clinics. Several factors account for this uprising. Among them, the concept of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)-free clinic, the increasing use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), the improved vitrification systems, and the growing evidence regarding similar, or even better, pregnancy rates when FET are compared to fresh embryo transfers.
In the last few years, research has focused on the selection of the best protocol for endometrial preparation in patients undergoing FET cycles. Despite the accumulating evidence suggesting similar reproductive outcomes following both artificial cycle (AC-FET) and natural cycle (NC-FET) protocols, AC-FET is frequently adopted in ART centers due to its convenience in terms of cycle scheduling. However, a role for the corpus luteum in the maternal vasodilatory changes of early pregnancy has recently been associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia. In fact, several large cohort studies have reported a higher risk of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, macrosomia, post-term delivery and cesarean section following AC-FET.
The NPP-FET protocol is a strategy that potentially allows for cycle scheduling while maintaining the benefits of the natural cycle in terms of pregnancy outcomes. The main goal of the present study is to analyze its convenience in terms of the number of appointments needed before FET scheduling by comparing it with the NC-FET protocol. Additionally, the investigators aim to compare the reproductive outcomes between the two strategies and to analyze whether NPP-FET patients undergo ovulation.
Briefly, the study group will prospectively recruit ovulatory patients who will perform vaginal ultrasound monitoring will be performed on cycle day 8-12, depending on the length of the patients' menstrual cycle. When the endometrial thickness is at least 7 mm and the dominant follicle is at least 13 mm, vaginal micronized progesterone will be initiated at 400mg every 12 hours. One embryo will be transferred on the fifth day of progesterone supplementation under ultrasound guidance. The control group will include a retrospective cohort of ovulatory patients who underwent NC-FET.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
When endometrial thickness is above 7 mm, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered 400mg 12/12h when the dominant follicle is at least 13 mm, serum estradiol (E2) levels are >80 pg/ml, and serum progesterone levels are <1.5ng/ml. Embryo transfer will be performed on the fifth day of progesterone.
Time frame: Up to three weeks
Number of visits for cycle monitoring until embryo transfer scheduling
Time frame: Up to four weeks
Number of days since the first day of menstrual bleeding until the day of embryo transfer
Time frame: One day
Percentage of patients with low serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer
Time frame: 10-14 days after ET
Proportion of patients with a positive hCG test
Time frame: Up to 20 weeks after ET
Proportion of patients with spontaneous loss of an intra-uterine pregnancy prior to 22 completed weeks of gestational age
Time frame: 9-11 weeks after ET
Proportion of patients with a pregnancy beyond the 11th week
Time frame: 40 weeks after ET
Proportion of patients with a live birth
Time frame: 5 weeks
Serum Relaxin-2 levels (colateral study)
Time frame: 5 days
Serum LH levels (colateral study)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidade de Lisboa
Network
Assessing the Convenience of Natural Proliferative Phase Frozen Embryo Transfer: an Ambispective Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06239376
Adenomyosis, Female Urogenital Diseases
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT06526520
Frozen Embryo Transfer
Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT05332769
Cumulus Cell, Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT04371783
Frozen Embryo Transfer, IVF
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details