Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06980883

Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult Females

Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult females. The study employed a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Masr university for sceince and technology

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

A total of 45 female patients diagnosed with chondromalacia and confirmed by physical examination using a patellar grind test to confirm Clarke's sign were recruited for this study from the out patient clinic and Soad Kafafi's educational hospital , Investigations that analyzed the H/Q ratio by the use of gravity corrected isokinetic strength testing.

Inclusion criteria

were:

  • Age between 18-50 years old, the anterior knee pain recorded while one of the following activities at least :ascending and descending stairs, prolonged sitting and kneeling.
  • Subject experiences pain during palpation of patellar facets or while performing a 25-cm step down test or double legged squat.
  • Exclusion criteria included meniscal or intra-articular pathological conditions, cruciate or collateral ligaments involvement, tenderness over the patellar tendon .
  • These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, each consisting of 15 patients all received treatment for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Group 1: Received dry needling combined with traditional treatment( straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises) for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Group 2: Received myofascial release in addition to traditional treatment for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Evaluation of fascial restriction was assessed using the therapists elbow.

Myofascial chain release:

Position of the patient: Supine lying, prone lying and side lying Position of the therapist: Side of the patient limb to be treated

-Technique: Using the therapist elbow a vertical release proximal to the attachment of the muscle belly or fascia was applied. Once an end-feel was reached a slow stroke down the length of the target tissue was performed along with monitoring the indirect feedback and tissue tension to identify any additional restrictions. The long stroke was repeated in a line parallel to the first stroke. It was continued until an end-feel is reached throughout the entire muscle belly or fascia on the most restricted/ painful points.

Traditional Treatment ( exercise) : Applied uniformly across all groups, comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).

Group 3: Received only the traditional treatment only for 3 weeks, 2 sessions per weak.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18-50 years old, the anterior knee pain recorded while one of the following activities at least :ascending and descending stairs, prolonged sitting and kneeling.
  • Subject experiences pain during palpation of patellar facets or while performing a 25-cm step down test or double legged squat. (Iiona, 2020)

Exclusion criteria

  • excluded meniscal or intra-articular pathological conditions, cruciate or collateral ligaments involvement, tenderness over the patellar tendon .
  • These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, each consisting of 15 patients all received treatment for 3 weaks, 2 sessions per weak.

Treatment and study plan

dry needling

Other

dry needles Administered to patients in Group 1 as part of their treatment regimen( 2 days per week).

Myofascial Release

Other

Myofascial Release: Provided to patients in Group 2 along with traditional treatment( 2 days per week).

Evaluation of fascial restriction was assessed using the therapists elbow. Any restrictions felt were assessed and given treatment.Myofascial chain release- Position of the patient- Supine lying, prone lying and side lying Position of the therapist- Side of the patient limb to be treated

  • Technique-Using the therapist elbow a vertical release proximal to the attachment of the muscle belly or fascia was applied. Once an end-feel was reached a slow stroke down the length of the target tissue was performed along with monitoring the indirect feedback and tissue tension to identify any additional restrictions. The long stroke was repeated in a line parallel to the first stroke. It was continued until an end-feel is reached throughout the entire muscle belly or fascia on the most restricted/ painful points.

(traditional exercises)

Other

comprising straight leg raising and isometric quadriceps exercises (2 days per week).

Primary outcomes

  1. The isokinetic muscle strength

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    • Peak Torque (PT): Measured using the isokinetic dynamometer system to assess the strength of the muscles.
    • AGO/ANT Ratio: Evaluated using the isokinetic dynamometer system to examine the balance between agonist and antagonist muscle groups.
  2. pain intensity by visual analogue scale.

    Time frame: 3 Weeks

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Utilized to measure the intensity of pain experienced by the patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life physical and mental states

    Time frame: 3 Weeks

    Quality of Life Scale Questionnaire (QLS): Administered to assess both the physical and mental status of the patients.

  2. Activity and functional levels of Lower Extremity

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Lower Extremity Scale Questionnaire (LES): Used to evaluate the activity levels and functionality of the patients' lower extremities.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Badr University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessing Impact of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Needling for Chondromalacia in Adult Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: females

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 20, 2025
Registry last updated
May 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.