NK White Blood Cells and Interleukin in Children and Young Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT01875601
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT04071704
Although the clinical effectiveness of sarcoma treatment has improved, long-lasting and cumulative treatment side-effects may often detract from the overall marginal advantage. Information only on survival is insufficient to determine the net clinical benefit of a treatment. It is important to assess treatment effectiveness both in terms of objective outcomes (e.g., response, recurrence and survival) and in terms of subjective patient reported outcomes (PROs), objective functional outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Previous studies have predominantly used generic HRQoL instruments, which cover some relevant issues but do not capture all the unique experiences of patients with sarcoma, and thus lack content validity. A sarcoma-specific questionnaire should be able to detect, with more sensitivity, side-effects, symptoms and problems with function that are particularly relevant to patients with sarcoma. To date , there is no specific sarcoma HRQoL instrument available; and, given the heterogeneity of the disease in terms of subtype, location, age and treatment, the development of such an instrument may be challenging.
The aim of this collaborative project between the EORTC Quality of Life Group (QLG) and the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) is to raise the standard of HRQoL measurement in patients with sarcoma. An important question remains to be answered: Is it possible to develop one PROs questionnaire covering HRQoL issues that are relevant to all adult patients with sarcoma, or are the HRQoL issues related to the different localization / treatment sufficiently different to warrant the creation of separate item lists selected from the EORTC QLG Item Library?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
The investigators will follow the EORTC QLG questionnaire development guidelines. First, a computerized search of the academic literature will be performed to identify all relevant HRQoL issues for and existing HRQoL questionnaires currently used among patients with sarcoma. In parallel, semi-structured interviews will be conducted worldwide with patients with sarcoma(N=179) and health care professionals (HCPs; N=35; phase 1a). The patient sample will be stratified to capture diversity across the sarcoma population tumour location (extremities, axial, head and neck, thorax, retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal and gynecological), stage (localized vs. metastatic disease ) and type or lines of treatment .
This list of HRQoL issues generated by the a) literature search, b) relevant items from the Item Library, and c) semi-structured patient and HCP interviews, and will be consolidated into a comprehensive list of issues for all languages of collaborating countries.
In phase 1b, the new list of HRQoL issues will be presented to another group of patients with sarcoma(N=475) and HCPs (N=72). Patients and HCPs will be asked to rate the HRQoL issues on relevance (4point Likert scale) and to prioritize the 10 most important issues.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 1 week (and for several issues 4 weeks according to EORTC questionnaire guidelines)
the framework will outline which strategy to adopt for HRQoL in patients with sarcoma: the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 + one sarcoma module; EORTC QLQ-C30 + one sarcoma module + an item list; EORTC QLQ-C30 + item list.
This will be based on analysis of the interview data (patients and HCPs) and the relevance of certain HRQoL rated by patients and health care professionals and possible identification of certain subgroups (according to tumour localization, type of sarcoma, disease stage and treatment).
Time frame: 1 week (and for several issues 4 weeks according to EORTC questionnaire guidelines)
based on a literature review, analysis of interviews with patients and health care professionals we will create an exhaustive list of all HRQoL issues relevant to sarcoma patients.
Time frame: 1 week (and for several issues 4 weeks according to EORTC questionnaire guidelines)
the interview data and rating of HRQoL issues will be used to determine the overage of issues/ items in the EORTC Item Library and how the Item Library can be optimally used for the HRQoL measure for patients with sarcoma.
Time frame: 1 week (and for several issues 4 weeks according to EORTC questionnaire guidelines)
In order to determine if issues are sarcoma-generic or dependent of sarcoma localization, sarcoma subtype, disease stage or treatment we will analyze the proportion of patients in each subgroup rating HRQoL issues or items as relevant
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Other
Incorporating the Patient Voice in Sarcoma Research: How Can we Assess Health-related Quality of Life in This Heterogeneous Group of Patients?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01875601
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05708950
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07651020
Adnexal Diseases, Astrocytoma
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04025931
Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details