Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00401830

Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide Compared to Placebo in Reducing Signs and Symptoms of Fibromyalgia Syndrome.

This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 400mg/day of lacosamide as compared to placebo in reducing the signs and symptoms of fibromyalgia syndrome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This was a proof-of-concept study and not powered for statistical comparisons.

The trial consisted of a 4-week Titration Phase, an 8-week Maintenance Phase, a 1-week Taper Phase, and a 2-week Safety Follow-Up Phase. If subjects met the eligibility criteria, they were randomized to receive either lacosamide 400mg/day or placebo during the Maintenance Phase. Subjects assigned to lacosamide were titrated from 100mg/day to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg. All subjects who completed the 4-week Titration Phase entered an 8-week Maintenance Phase. No dose adjustment was allowed during the Maintenance Phase. The Treatment Phase was defined as the combined Titration and Maintenance Phases.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females, 18 to 65 years old
  • Fulfills all 3 points of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition for diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • At least moderate pain (pain intensity ≥ 5 on Likert pain scale (0-10) during the 7 days prior to Baseline)
  • Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score ≥ 50
  • Completed an adequate washout period for excluded medications prior to beginning the Baseline Diary Phase

Exclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic regional or structural rheumatic disease
  • Diagnosed neuropathic pain syndrome
  • Receiving treatment with neurostimulating devices
  • Significant psychopathology
  • History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Been hospitalized for psychiatric or behavioral reasons within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Clinically significant abnormal vitals, cardiac dysfunction and /or arrhythmias
  • Taken neuroleptics, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
  • Other medical conditions that could compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Lacosamide

Drug

Tablet 400mg daily (200mg twice daily) during 8-week maintenance phase following 4-week titration phase starting at 100mg/day and increasing to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg

Other names: Vimpat, Harkoseride

Placebo

Other

Matching placebo tablet administered twice daily

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Full Analysis Set)

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

  2. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Per Protocol Set)

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to a greater impact of fibromyalgia

  2. Change From Baseline in Total Myalgic Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Total Myalgic Score ranges from 0 to 54 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of pain.

  3. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Interference With Sleep to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Sleep scale - the subject rated quality of sleep, from 0 (very good sleep) to 10 (very poor sleep)

  4. Change From Baseline in Daily Interference With General Activity to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    General activity scale - the subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity, from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered)

  5. Change From Baseline in Morning Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase

    An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

  6. Change From Baseline in Evening Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase

    An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Assessment From Baseline to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    The PGIC is a 7-point self-administered categorical rating scale in which the subject rated the change in pain since starting trial medication (from much worse [score of 1] to much better [score of 7]).

  8. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administered instrument for detecting anxiety and depression in medical outpatients. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each subscale with higher scores reflecting a greater level of anxiety or depression.

  9. Percentage of Patients Using Rescue Medication During the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: 12-week Treatment Phase

    Subjects recorded use of rescue medication for pain in the diary daily in the evening with a Yes/No response.

  10. Percentage of Patients Using Alcohol for Pain During the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: 12-week Treatment Phase

    Use of alcohol to treat pain in the past 24 hours was recorded (Yes/No response).

  11. Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Symptom Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase

    All scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of symptom severity.

  12. Lacosamide Plasma Concentration at the End of the Maintenance Phase/ Week 12

    Time frame: End of the Maintenance Phase/Week 12

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UCB Pharma

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Parallel, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Proof of Concept Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 400 mg/Day Lacosamide Tablets in Subjects With Signs and Symptoms Associated With Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Nov 22, 2006
Registry last updated
Jul 18, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.