Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01862133

Aspiring to Awesome- Patient Preference Privacy Selections in EMR

Health information technology, including health information exchange, offers the potential to improve care by providing an integrated view of relevant, integrated patient information from multiple health care providers practicing in multiple sites. However, realizing that potential can be difficult, particularly with respect sensitive information. Increasingly, patients, patient advocate groups, and even the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology are pushing for patients to have more granular control over specifically who can see what personal health information in their electronic health records.

This will be a demonstration project aimed at showing the initial feasibility a system allowing patient controls on their electronic health records. Because of the exploratory nature of the research, the investigators do not have specific hypotheses. The investigators hope that this demonstration and feasibility project will lead to more extensive prospective evaluations of patient control of access to their health records and other tools for enhancing patient control over access to their health records.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Wishard Health Services, Primary Care Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

About this study

In 2010, ONC launched a Challenge Grant program that called for proposals for "enabling enhanced query for patient care." Under this program, the Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University developed a Web-based program for patients' to express their preferences for who can access data in their electronic health records (EHR). It then applied these preferences by modifying an existing EHR viewer called Careweb® that is used by the Indiana Network for Patient Care and Eskenazi Health, an urban public health system in Indianapolis.

This study:

  • Produced a bioethical report on "points to consider" to inform electronic health record designers concerning giving patients granular control over access to their health data.
  • Interviewed patients to assess their desires for granular level of control over which personal health information should be shared, with whom, and for what purpose, and whether those preferences vary depending on the sensitivity of patients' health information.
  • Developed a Web-based patient-centered user interface that allows them to choose whether to provide or restrict access to their health information, focusing on who (health care providers and non-providers), what information (all, none, sensitive information only), and when (periods of time in their lives during which they desire restricting access to their health information) .
  • Reprogrammed the user interface of Careweb®, a data viewing system used by clinicians in Eskenazi Health, the third largest safety net health system in the U.S., and the Indiana Network for Patient Care, the oldest, largest, and most comprehensive health information exchange in the country. The reprogrammed viewer interface allows patients' preferences to control who sees what information in a patient's electronic health record.
  • Performed a demonstration study among 32 health care providers (9 physicians and 23 clinical staff) and 105 patients in an inner city primary care practice where patients recorded their preferences concerning who could access what information in their electronic health records, and then implemented those preferences during a 6-month real-world study in Eskenazi Health.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For Patients:

  • all adults 18 years or older who were fluent in English and had visited the study primary care clinic at least twice in the previous year

For Providers:

  • all personnel of all types practicing in General Medicine Clinic, both Firms A and B, on the 4th floor of Wishard's Primary Care Center. For those physicians who agree to participate, attempted to recruit 10 patients who had visited their primary care physician at least twice in the previous 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

  • will be lack of English fluency and inability to communicate due to physiologic or cognitive difficulties.

Treatment and study plan

Patient preferences

Other

Software for recording patients' preferences for which providers see which parts of their EMRs, and EMR software for restricting access to data based on patients' preferences.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Recording Preferences to Restrict Provider Access to Some or All Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data

    Time frame: 6 month study

    Patients had to restrict access to either all data or one of five categories of "sensitive" data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, sexual health and pregnancy, drug and alcohol use and abuse, and mental health information) to one or more of the study providers.

  2. Providers' Opinion of Patients' Controlling EHR Access

    Time frame: 6 month study

    Percent of providers answering "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" to the following question on the post-study survey: "I think it is OK for patients to have control over who sees what information in their electronic health records."

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • Regenstrief Institute, Inc.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
May 24, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 19, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.