Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01408186

ASP (PPI_H2RA) Study-H2RA Versus PPI for the Prevention of Recurrent UGIB in High-risk Users of Low-dose ASA

Peptic ulcer bleeding associated with ASA or NSAIDs is a major cause of hospitalization in Hong Kong. The investigators previously showed that ASA or NSAIDs accounted for about half of all cases of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer bleeding. Currently, ASA use has contributed to about one-third of the bleeding ulcers admitted to the investigators hospital that serves a local population of 1.5 million.

In patients with acute coronary syndrome or acute ischemic stroke who develop ASA-induced bleeding peptic ulcers, whether ASA should be discontinued before ulcers have healed is a major dilemma. In another double-blind randomized trial, the investigators have shown that discontinuation of ASA after endoscopic treatment of bleeding ulcers was associated with a significantly increased in mortality within 8 weeks.

In the absence of safer aspirins, co-therapy with a gastroprotective drug remains the dominant preventive strategy. Given the vast number of people taking ASA, however, it is only cost-effective to identify and treat those who are at high risk of ulcer bleeding and who have a strong indication for ASA use. Data from observational studies and randomized trials have consistently shown that PPIs are effective in reducing the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with ASA. Other potential preventive strategies include eradication of H. pylori infection, substitution of ASA for other non-aspirin anti-platelet drugs, and co-therapy with misoprostol or H2RAs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong

Loading trial locations.

About this study

No dose of "low-dose" aspirin (ASA) is safe in terms of the risk if ulcer bleeding. Even at a dose as low as 75 mg daily, ASA doubles the risk of ulcer bleeding when compared to the risk in non-users. This rise in the incidence was associated with a 44% increase in usage of ASA. In Hong Kong, ASA is also a major cause of peptic ulcer complications.

In the absence of safer aspirins, co-therapy with a gastroprotective drug remains the dominant preventive strategy. Given the vast number of people taking ASA, however, it is only cost-effective to identify and treat those who are at high risk of ulcer bleeding and who have a strong indication for ASA use. Data from observational studies and randomized trials have consistently shown that PPIs are effective in reducing the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with ASA. Other potential preventive strategies include eradication of H. pylori infection, substitution of ASA for other non-aspirin anti-platelet drugs, and co-therapy with misoprostol or H2RAs. Among these preventive strategies, co-therapy with a PPI for prevention of ulcer bleeding in high-risk ASA users remains the most studied and best proven strategy.

H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are relatively weak acid suppressing drugs when compared to PPIs. Very few studies have evaluated the efficacy of H2RAs in the prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding with ASA. Two case-control studies yielded conflicting results with regard to the efficacy of H2RAs in reducing the risk of hospitalizations for ulcer bleeding with ASA. There is a limited data on the efficacy of H2RAs, however, our local health authority has endorsed the use of H2RA as a co-therapy in high-risk ASA users since 2001.

On the other hand, H2RAs have two potential advantages over PPIs. First, generic H2RAs are much cheaper than generic PPIs in Hong Kong. Second, unlike the interaction between PPIs and clopidogrel, concomitant use of H2RAs and clopidogrel is not associated with an increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. Thus, H2RA might be a cheap and safe gastroprotective drug in patients requiring dual anti-platelet therapy (i.e., ASA and clopidogrel) who require coronary stents.

In patients with acute coronary syndrome or acute ischemic stroke who develop ASA-induced bleeding peptic ulcers, whether ASA should be discontinued before ulcers have healed is a major dilemma. In another double-blind randomized trial, we have shown that discontinuation of ASA after endoscopic treatment of bleeding ulcers was associated with a significantly increased in mortality within 8 weeks.

The investigators aim to test the hypothesis that PPI is superior to H2RA for the prevention of recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in ASA users with a history ulcer bleeding

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A history of documented peptic ulcer bleeding (self-reported history without confirmation by the clinician is not acceptable)
  • Negative tests for H. pylori or successful eradication of H. pylori based on urease test or histology
  • Expected regular use of ASA for the duration of the trial
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • A history of gastric or duodenal surgery other than patch repair
  • Severe erosive esophagitis (LA grade C or D)
  • Gastric outlet obstruction
  • Terminal illness
  • Active malignancies

Treatment and study plan

rabeprazole

Drug

Rabeprazole 20 mg daily

Other names: Pariet

Famotidine

Drug

Famotidine 40mg daily

Other names: Pepcidine

Primary outcomes

  1. recurrent non-variceal upper GI bleeding

    Time frame: 12 months

    defined as hematemesis, melena or a decrease in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dL with ulcers or bleeding erosions confirmed by endoscopy, and adjudicated by an independent committee

Secondary outcomes

  1. lower GI bleeding

    Time frame: 12 Months

    defined by either melena or rectal bleeding causing hospital admission or transfusion, with negative results on upper endoscopy, or by a decrease in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dL in association with negative results on upper endoscopy and no other explanations for the anemia.

  2. atherothrombotic events

    Time frame: 12 months

    atherothrombotic events

  3. A composite of recurrent upper GI bleeding or recurrent endoscopic ulcers

    Time frame: 12 months

    defined as hematemesis, melena or a decrease in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dL with ulcers or bleeding erosions confirmed by endoscopy, and adjudicated by an independent committee

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonist Versus Proton-Pump Inhibitor for the Prevention of Recurrent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (UGI) in High-risk Users of Low-dose Aspirin (ASA)

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 3, 2011
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.