iAPS
DeviceThe AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices.
NCT Number: NCT04142229
This feasibility study is a randomized crossover trial that will compare the efficacy and safety of an automated insulin delivery (AID) system in patients with type 1 diabetes using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm versus sensor augmented pump therapy (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS), and will include different stress induction and assessments over a 4 week period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: 1) AID for two weeks and SAP/PLGS for two weeks , or 2) SAP/PLGS for two weeks and AID for two weeks. During the 4-week trial, subjects will wear the Empatica E4 wristband every day to record electrodermal activity, accelerometer and heartrate data. Subjects will also complete logbooks to record activity and stress. During each two-week period, subjects will come to the clinical center twice for stress induction tests in a medically supervised setting.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices.
Subjects will use their home insulin pump and a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time in target glucose range 70-180 mg/dL measured by CGM to determine safety and efficacy of the integrated system
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in glucose levels with stress induction sessions (mg/dL)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in insulin requirements with stress induction sessions (units of insulin)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Analysis of EDA to verify stress detection and correlation to glucose changes, both during the stress sessions and in the outpatient setting
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent time within the target range of 70-180 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent time GGM glucose < 70 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent time GGM glucose < 54 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent time GGM glucose > 180 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent time GGM glucose > 250 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
The total number of serious adverse events during the clinical trial
Time frame: 4 weeks
The total number of serious adverse events related to the study device use during the clinical trial
Time frame: 4 weeks
The total number of adverse device effects (ADE) during the clinical trial
Time frame: 4 weeks
The total number of unanticipated adverse device effects (UADE) during the clinical trial
Time frame: 4 weeks
Salivary cortisol assessment (nmol/l) during psychologic and physiologic stress induction
Time frame: 4 weeks
EDA Measurement of psychologic and physiologic stress from the Empatica E4 Watch
Time frame: 4 weeks
Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) score at end of each test induction
Time frame: 4 weeks
Socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT) score at end of each test induction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Percent time (hours/day) of closed-loop use during the two weeks of iAPS use
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total hours of CGM sensor use time during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total number of devices issues during the clinical trial
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total daily insulin use (units/day) during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total daily basal insulin use (units/day) during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Time frame: 4 weeks
Total daily bolus insulin use (units/day) during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Time frame: 2 weeks
Questionnaire before and after AID use to assess technology acceptance, fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes associated distress (Likert Scale)
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Other
A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Artificial Pancreas vs. Sensor Augmented Pump/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend With Different Stress Assessments in the Outpatient Setting for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05488119
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07696780
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05610111
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06308549
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Distress
Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial Details