Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04510506

Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation

This study designed to assess changes in control of Type 1 Diabetes in pubertal adolescents over a two year period. There are two arms/substudies, the first being a longitudinal randomized controlled trial and the second an observational study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

11 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904, United States

About this study

The investigators will recruit adolescents with type 1 diabetes age 11-<13 years and one parent to participate in this 24-month study. While this is admittedly a long enrollment time, study commitments following enrollment will be limited to three in-person or video visits at yearly intervals and one virtual or in-person device training session to improve adherence. Participants must be pubertal, as puberty appears to contribute significantly to the insulin resistance that is likely related to worsened blood glucose control. Pubertal assessments will occur at yearly intervals.

The first of the two arms/substudies ("Randomized" substudy) is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial for which participants will be randomized to either continue their current diabetes therapy (with the addition of use of a Dexcom CGM, forming the "Usual Care+CGM" Control Group; this includes both adolescents using non-automated insulin delivery (AID) insulin pumps or multiple daily injections [MDI]). The Experimental Group will use an AP system (Tandem's Control-IQ system) during the two-year duration of the study. The primary outcome of the Randomized substudy will be HbA1c between intervention groups at the 24-month visit.

The second arm/substudy ("Triple Label Surveillance" substudy) is an observational study. Both arms/substudies perform a "Triple Label" mixed meal study assessing glucose flux and insulin resistance that requires visits to the Clinical Research Unit. All participants will undergo a Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment at months 0, 12 and 24. This assessment evaluates the degree of insulin resistance including in the hepatic and peripheral compartments. During Visit 2, all participants (for both the Triple Label sub-study and the Glycemia-Only sub-study) will complete multiple questionnaires assessing aspects of adolescent psychology and sociology. HbA1c will also be collected using a local lab. The primary outcome of the study overall (combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies) is the change in insulin resistance between baseline and the 24-month visit.

CGM glucose data will be collected continuously via remote connection during the entire study. At months 6 and 18, participants will be contacted to obtain insulin management information and will have HbA1c measures assessed at a local clinic or laboratory. Additional scheduled phone calls will occur in the month before the in-person study visits to request HbA1c and confirm body composition/Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment scheduling and discuss use of CGM and activity tracker. Participants will be contacted in the event of insufficient CGM or AP system use. For the Randomized substudy, in the Eperimental Group, insufficient use is defined as <60% AP use over a 3-month period. For the Control Group, less than 1 month of CGM data over a 3-month period is considered insufficient. If participants do not meet minimum use criteria in 2 successive periods, the participant will be discontinued from the study.

The investigators are targeting completion of 42 child/parent dyads combined between the Randomized substudy and the Triple Label Surveillance sub-study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 11 to <13 years (at time of enrollment) with a parent/guardian (18+ yo) who is willing to participate with the child
  • At least Tanner 2 pubic hair (boys), Tanner 2 breast development (girls)
  • HbA1c <10 clinically obtained within the last 6 weeks; if the participant is unable to go to the laboratory or clinic because of stay-at-home orders, the entry hemoglobin A1c level can be assessed via outside laboratory (e.g. LabCorp), home HbA1c device, recent clinically-obtained HbA1c in past month..
  • Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year
  • Currently using insulin for at least six months
  • Both prior pump and MDI users will use insulin parameters such as carbohydrate ratio and correction factors consistently on their pump in order to dose insulin for meals or corrections
  • Access to internet and willingness to upload data during the study as needed
  • For females, not currently known to be pregnant or breastfeeding
  • If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of childbearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued.
  • Willingness to suspend use of any personal CGM for the duration of the clinical trial once the study CGM is in use
  • Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study, if randomized to the Control-IQ group.
  • Total daily insulin dose (TDD) at least 10 U/day and not more than 100 U/day
  • Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals)
  • An understanding and willingness to follow the protocol and signed informed consent
  • Participants must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment.
  • Contact with primary diabetes physician to discuss study details and the participant's care, with study team continuing to feel that the participant is appropriate for study inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Hemoglobin A1c >10% clinically obtained within the past 6 weeks
  • A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples:
  • Severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease, or dialysis
  • Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past six months
  • Presence of a known adrenal disorder
  • Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase>2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function
  • Uncontrolled thyroid disease
  • Concurrent use of any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent.
  • Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder.
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the trial
  • Currently being treated for a seizure disorder
  • Planned surgery during study duration
  • Treatment with any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals)
  • A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol
  • Use of an insulin delivery mechanism that is not downloadable by the subject or study team
  • (Randomized substudy only) Current use of an automated insulin delivery system (besides LGS and PLGS) such as Medtronic 670G, Control-IQ or DIY system (or unwillingness to discontinue automated insulin delivery for three months before enrollment and the duration of the trial).
  • Having a family member(s) employed by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. or Dexcom, Inc.
  • Current enrollment in another clinical trial, unless approved by the investigator of both studies or if clinical trial is a non-interventional registry trial.

Treatment and study plan

Artificial Pancreas (AP)

Device

The AP system used in this trial is the Tandem t:slim insulin pump with Control-IQ Technology. This system is FDA approved for use starting at age 14 years.

Primary outcomes

  1. Randomized substudy: The 24-month HbA1c between AP system and Usual Care+CGM groups, performed as regression, adjusted for baseline HbA1c.

    Time frame: 2 years

    Measure of HbA1c

  2. Combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies: Change in insulin sensitivity (Si) over time

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

    Changes in Si (from triple-label, mixed-meal test) over time between baseline and 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in EGP over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  2. Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Appearance (Ra)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in Ra over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  3. Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Disappearance (Rd)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in Rd over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  4. Randomized Substudy: Comparison of Glycemic Control (below also) - Time in range, overall

    Time frame: 2 years

    Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: overall

  5. Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 0-6

    Time frame: 6 months

    Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 0-6

  6. Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 6-12

    Time frame: months 6-12

    Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 6-12

  7. Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 12-18

    Time frame: months 12-18

    Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 12-18

  8. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI overall

    Time frame: 24 months

    Overall total daily insulin

  9. Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 18-24

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 18-24

  10. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 0-6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Total daily insulin, months 0-6

  11. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 6-12 months

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Total daily insulin, months 6-12

  12. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 12-18 months

    Time frame: months 12-18

    Total daily insulin, months 12-18

  13. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 18-24 months

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Total daily insulin, months 18-24

  14. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin total

    Time frame: 24 months

    Overall total basal insulin

  15. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 0-6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Total basal insulin, months 0-6

  16. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 6-12 months

    Time frame: months 6-12

    Total basal insulin, months 6-12

  17. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 12-18 months

    Time frame: months 12-18

    Total basal insulin, months 12-18

  18. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 18-24 months

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Total basal insulin, months 18-24

  19. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio overall

    Time frame: 24 months

    Overall insulin:carb ratio

  20. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 0-6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Insulin:carb ratio, months 0-6

  21. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 6-12 months

    Time frame: months 6-12

    Insulin:carb ratio, months 6-12

  22. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 12-18 months

    Time frame: months 12-18

    Insulin:carb ratio, months 12-18

  23. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 18-24 months

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Insulin:carb ratio, months 18-24

  24. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor overall

    Time frame: 24 months

    Overall insulin sensitivity factor

  25. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 0-6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Insulin sensitivity factor months 0-6

  26. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 6-12 months

    Time frame: months 6-12

    Insulin sensitivity factor months 6-12

  27. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 12-18 months

    Time frame: months 12-18

    Insulin sensitivity factor months 12-18

  28. Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 18-24 months

    Time frame: months 18-24

    Insulin sensitivity factor months 18-24

  29. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time 70-180 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Time 70-180 mg/dL

  30. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time <70 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Time <70 mg/dL

  31. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >180 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Time >180 mg/dL

  32. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >250 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Time >250 mg/dL

  33. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Number of hypoglycemia events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Number of hypoglycemia events/24 hours of CGM data available

  34. Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Total daily insulin injected

    Time frame: 24 months

    Total daily insulin injected (pump users only in Usual Care+CGM group)

  35. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  36. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  37. Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  38. Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  39. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  40. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  41. Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  42. Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  43. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  44. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  45. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  46. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  47. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  48. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  49. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  50. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  51. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  52. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  53. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  54. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  55. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  56. Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  57. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months

    Time frame: 2 years

    Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  58. Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  59. Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  60. Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  61. Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  62. Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  63. Family conflict, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  64. Family conflict, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  65. Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  66. Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  67. Peer influence, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  68. Peer influence, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  69. Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  70. Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  71. Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  72. Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  73. Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  74. Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  75. Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  76. Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  77. Depression, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  78. Depression, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  79. Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  80. Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  81. Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  82. Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  83. Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  84. Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  85. Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  86. Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  87. Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 24 months

    T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  88. Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)

    Time frame: 12 months

    T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM

  89. Both substudies: Change in HbA1c

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in HbA1c over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  90. Both substudies: Change in percent time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in TIR over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  91. Both substudies: Change in percent time >180 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in percent time >180 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months

  92. Both substudies: Change in percent time <70 mg/dL

    Time frame: 24 months

    Change in percent time <70 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia

Other

Collaborators

  • DexCom, Inc.
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  • Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Registry information

Acronym: AP APPLE

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 12, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.