Region Metropolitana de Chile
Santiago, Chile
NCT Number: NCT07510425
Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for patient recovery, satisfaction, and the reduction of hospital stay duration. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) via catheter placement represent a cornerstone in achieving these objectives. Traditionally, follow-up for these patients has relied on standardized telephone protocols conducted by trained personnel. Original previous research in 2024 demonstrated that an automated text-messaging platform was feasible and maintained high patient satisfaction, it resulted in a significantly higher rate of unscheduled patient-initiated inquiries (28.3% vs. 6.4%) compared to traditional phone calls, likely due to a lack of adaptive response capabilities.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate an enhanced technological iteration of our follow-up platform. By integrating an Artificial Intelligence (AI) interface trained on specialized clinical protocols, the new system is designed to provide automated, personalized and adaptive recommendations to patients.
Methods and Intervention: The study will compare the effectiveness of this AI-driven platform against the previous version of the non-adaptive automated messaging system. The primary outcome is to compare the number of patient-initiated inquiries (re-consultations). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three.
Impact: The investigators hypothesize that the integration of AI will optimize human resources and improve patient autonomy without compromising safety or satisfaction, ultimately providing a scalable model for postoperative regional analgesia monitoring.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Santiago, Chile
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The study will compare the effectiveness of this AI-driven platform against the previous version of the non-adaptive automated messaging system. The primary outcome is to compare the number of patient-initiated inquiries (re-consultations). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three.
Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three
Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three
Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three
Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up
Comparison of patient-initiated inquiry rates between the Artificial Intelligence-driven application (AI-App) and the standard automated messaging application (Control-App) during ambulatory postoperative follow-up.
Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up
Proportion of patients who successfully engage with the AI-driven application. This includes a cumulative analysis over the 3-day follow-up period and a granular day-to-day response analysis.
Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up
Assessment and comparison of patient satisfaction scores between the AI-driven application group and the traditional telephone follow-up group, utilizing a standardized satisfaction scale survey in Spanish "Questionnaire of Satisfaction and Perceived Quality in Hospital Health Care of the Department of Studies and Development of the Superintendency of Health" (PQA). In this instrument, the patient was asked to respond using a five-point Likert scale. The extremes of the scale were labelled 'very poor' to 'definitely yes' depending upon the question. Patient responses to each PQA Likert scale and visual analogue questions were scored from 1 to 5. The performance score was defined as the proportion of patients with an unsatisfactory patient response. A quality index was calculated for each PQA question by multiplying the importance score against the performance score.
Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up
Comparative analysis of patient adherence between the standard automated messaging application (Control-App) and the AI-driven application (AI-App). Adherence is defined as the successful completion of the response protocol during the three-day monitoring period.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Felipe Yañez Herrera
CONTACT
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
CONTACT
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Other
Postoperative Follow-up Via Artificial Intelligence-Based Application Versus Automated Messaging Application in Patients Receiving Continuous Regional Analgesia: A Comparative Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07712783
Anesthesia, Neurologic Manifestations
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06665048
Agnosia, Analgesia, Postoperative
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06889870
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06282666
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Lublin, Poland
View Trial Details