Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07510425

Artificial Intelligence vs. Automated Messaging for Continuous Regional Analgesia Follow-up

Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for patient recovery, satisfaction, and the reduction of hospital stay duration. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) via catheter placement represent a cornerstone in achieving these objectives. Traditionally, follow-up for these patients has relied on standardized telephone protocols conducted by trained personnel. Original previous research in 2024 demonstrated that an automated text-messaging platform was feasible and maintained high patient satisfaction, it resulted in a significantly higher rate of unscheduled patient-initiated inquiries (28.3% vs. 6.4%) compared to traditional phone calls, likely due to a lack of adaptive response capabilities.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate an enhanced technological iteration of our follow-up platform. By integrating an Artificial Intelligence (AI) interface trained on specialized clinical protocols, the new system is designed to provide automated, personalized and adaptive recommendations to patients.

Methods and Intervention: The study will compare the effectiveness of this AI-driven platform against the previous version of the non-adaptive automated messaging system. The primary outcome is to compare the number of patient-initiated inquiries (re-consultations). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three.

Impact: The investigators hypothesize that the integration of AI will optimize human resources and improve patient autonomy without compromising safety or satisfaction, ultimately providing a scalable model for postoperative regional analgesia monitoring.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
  • Physical status classification ASA I or II.
  • Scheduled for ambulatory surgical programs at UC Christus Health Network centers (Hospital Clínico, Clínica San Carlos de Apoquindo, or Centro Médico Santa Lucía).
  • Patients receiving postoperative pain management via continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) with a perineural catheter and disposable infusion pump.
  • Ownership and documented proficiency in operating a smartphone to access the mobile application.
  • Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to understand or follow the digital monitoring protocol.
  • Patients not meeting the age or ASA physical status requirements.

Treatment and study plan

AI-driven follow-up platform

Other

The study will compare the effectiveness of this AI-driven platform against the previous version of the non-adaptive automated messaging system. The primary outcome is to compare the number of patient-initiated inquiries (re-consultations). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three.

Satisfaction

Other

Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three

Adherence to the follow-up protocol

Other

Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three

Response rates from postoperative days one through three

Other

Register patient satisfaction, adherence to the follow-up protocol, and response rates from postoperative days one through three

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of patient-initiated inquiry rates between AI-App and Control-App

    Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up

    Comparison of patient-initiated inquiry rates between the Artificial Intelligence-driven application (AI-App) and the standard automated messaging application (Control-App) during ambulatory postoperative follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Engage with the AI-driven app

    Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up

    Proportion of patients who successfully engage with the AI-driven application. This includes a cumulative analysis over the 3-day follow-up period and a granular day-to-day response analysis.

  2. Assessment patient satisfaction

    Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up

    Assessment and comparison of patient satisfaction scores between the AI-driven application group and the traditional telephone follow-up group, utilizing a standardized satisfaction scale survey in Spanish "Questionnaire of Satisfaction and Perceived Quality in Hospital Health Care of the Department of Studies and Development of the Superintendency of Health" (PQA). In this instrument, the patient was asked to respond using a five-point Likert scale. The extremes of the scale were labelled 'very poor' to 'definitely yes' depending upon the question. Patient responses to each PQA Likert scale and visual analogue questions were scored from 1 to 5. The performance score was defined as the proportion of patients with an unsatisfactory patient response. A quality index was calculated for each PQA question by multiplying the importance score against the performance score.

  3. Adherence between the Control-App and AI-App

    Time frame: From registration to the end of the 3-day outpatient postoperative follow-up

    Comparative analysis of patient adherence between the standard automated messaging application (Control-App) and the AI-driven application (AI-App). Adherence is defined as the successful completion of the response protocol during the three-day monitoring period.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Felipe Yañez Herrera

CONTACT

[email protected]

+56988129267

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

CONTACT

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Postoperative Follow-up Via Artificial Intelligence-Based Application Versus Automated Messaging Application in Patients Receiving Continuous Regional Analgesia: A Comparative Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 3, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.