Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06093217

Artificial Intelligence to Improve Detection and Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (AID-PE)

The goal of this exploratory observational study is to assess the feasibility and real-world clinical impact of implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for the detection of acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in patients who undergo Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA). The main questions that this study aims to answer are:

[Question 1] What is the real-world impact of AI on the clinical outcomes and decision making by radiologists and clinicians in the management of acute PE?

[Question 2] Is AI software for the detection of acute PE acceptable to use in clinical practice and do they have a favourable impact on clinical workload?

[Question 3] Is it cost-effective to implement AI software for the detection of acute PE in clinical practice?

Patients having a CTPA for the detection of acute PE will have their imaging analysed by AI software in combination with a human radiologist. Researchers will aim to compare the clinical and radiology specific outcomes with a retrospective cohort of patients who have had standard routine radiology reporting.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Royal United Hospitals, Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Bath, BA1 3NG, United Kingdom

About this study

Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) results from partial or total occlusion of the pulmonary blood vessels by thrombus, which can cause right ventricular failure and death if not diagnosed and treated early. Acute PE is a common condition with rising mortality. Patients with acute PE are often poorly risk stratified despite clear guidelines. In fact, the 2019 National Confidential Inquiry into Patient related Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) for acute PE highlighted the need to address worsening mortality rates through appropriate risk stratification of the condition.

ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute PE also advise on the importance of risk stratification. An increased right ventricle: left ventricle (RV:LV) ratio >1.0 on Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) is associated 2.5-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality, and 5-fold risk for PE-related mortality. This metric is intended to help clinicians distinguish between patients with high and low risk acute PE. Patients stratified as high risk (RV:LV ratio >1.0) necessitate closer monitoring within an inpatient setting. Whereas, patients stratified as low risk (RV:LV ratio <1.0) are suitable for early discharge through ambulatory pathways.

Therefore, the provision of RV:LV metrics within radiology reporting has potentially important clinical implications. If clinicians are not provided with any quantifiable evidence of RV dysfunction on which to base their treatment decisions, patients with high risk acute PE may be unintentionally considered 'low risk' and discharged home. Furthermore, patients with low risk acute PE may be subject to longer, and potentially unnecessary, inpatient stays which undoubtedly contributes to the cost of healthcare. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology within radiology reporting of CTPAs for acute PE could be a potential solution to address this challenge.

AI is an increasingly attractive technology within healthcare. It describes a number of computer software techniques which mimic human cognitive function. AI shows promise in ability to detect and risk stratify acute PE. However, most studies have been conducted in retrospective cohorts. Furthermore, no study current has addressed the health economic impact of implementing AI technology within the real-world reporting of acute PE.

This observational study will be led by Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust (RUH). The aim of this study is to integrate Artificial Intelligence and machine learning technology within the reporting of CTPAs for acute PE. The investigators hypothesise that AI technology can improve the prompt diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute PE within a real-world clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesis that integration of AI technology is cost-effective, and acceptable to radiologists and clinicians.

Patients whose scans will be included in the study will be all those consecutively presenting to the RUH with a possible diagnosis of acute PE for 12 months before (comparator cohort) and 12 months after (intervention cohort) 'live' introduction of integrated AI technology reporting. For all recruited participants, an anonymised clinician case report form will be used to capture details relating to their demographics, clinical-radiological PE severity, their management, and outcomes including mortality at 12 months.

At the point of analysis, the investigators will perform adjustments/matching between the two cohorts for patient baseline characteristics. The investigators will also adjust for calendar time of recruitment, to account for temporal trends. Analysis between both cohorts will also allow development of a decision analysis model to assess the cost-effectiveness of integrated AI technology within CTPA report for acute PE. Clinician and radiologist questionnaires will be used to assess user acceptability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patient requiring CTPA to exclude or diagnose acute PE

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients who have registered with the national opt-out scheme for research
  • CTPA performed for reasons other than acute PE
  • CTPA performed for acute PE but reported by external radiologists
  • Incomplete or discontinued CTPA scans
  • Insufficient quality CTPA to allow for analysis by a radiologist

Treatment and study plan

Artificial intelligence

Device

AI technology will generate a report with relevant key slice imaging identifying the presence of an acute pulmonary embolism and RV:LV ratio measurements to the radiologist

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patient decisions made in line with evidence based best practice guidelines after introducing AI technology within CTPA reporting

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of acute PE detection with AI technology

    Time frame: 24 months

    True positives and True negatives

  2. Rate of discordant acute PE cases

    Time frame: 24 months

    False positive and false negative rate with acute PE detection

  3. AI failure rate for acute PE detection

    Time frame: 24 months

    Proportion of scans unable to be interpreted by AI despite suitable CTPA acquisition

  4. Rate of RV:LV detection with AI technology

    Time frame: 24 months

    True positive and true negative

  5. Rate of discordant RV:LV detection

    Time frame: 24 months

    False positive and false negative

  6. Failure rate for automated RV:LV ratio

    Time frame: 24 months

    Proportion of scans unable to calculate automated RV:LV ratio despite suitable CTPA acquisition

  7. 30 day mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patient mortality (death) at 30-days post-PE diagnosis. Comparison before and after AI introduction.

  8. 12 month mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patient mortality (death) at 12-months post-PE diagnosis. Comparison before and after AI introduction.

  9. Hospital admission and bed days for acute PE

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  10. Time to anticoagulation in PE cases

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  11. Time from CTPA to discharge

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  12. PE risk stratification rates (low, intermediate low, intermediate high and high risk)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  13. Cost to NHS for acute PE

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  14. End-user (clinician and radiologist) acceptability of AI technology

    Time frame: 12 months

    Quantified metrics from a non-validated questionnaire to evaluate end-use experience of integrated AI radiology reporting.

  15. Referral rates to outpatient follow-up (respiratory, thrombosis, haematology)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

  16. Diagnostic rate of Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison before and after AI introduction

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory outcomes

    Time frame: 12 months

    Given the exploratory nature of this observational non-randomised feasibility study, there may be patterns/outcomes which emerge/develop during the study period. The investigators will report on any patterns which may emerge following introduction of AI reporting.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • University of Bath
  • University of Bristol

Registry information

Official study title

Developing Artificial Intelligence Solutions to Improve Diagnosis and Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Acronym: AID-PE

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.