The diagnostic performance of AI system and endoscopists
Diagnostic TestEligible patients will undergo independent EGGIM score assessment by both endoscopists and the AI system.
NCT Number: NCT07257796
The endoscopic grading system (EGGIM) has been widely used to assess the extent of gastric intestinal metaplasia during endoscopy. Investigators developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system to automatically evaluate the extent of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and calculate the EGGIM scores in endoscopy examination. This study is a prospective, multi-center study aimed at exploring the performance and reliability of AI-EGGIM scoring.
This is a prospective study designed to validate the AI-EGGIM system in a larger cohort. The study protocol was developed based on preliminary experience from a prior investigation (NCT05464108).
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is an important precancerous stage in the gastric carcinogenesis cascade. The endoscopic grading system (EGGIM) has been proposed as a practical method to evaluate the extent of GIM during endoscopy. Investigators developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system to automatically assess the extent of GIM and calculate EGGIM scores from endoscopic examinations. This study is a prospective, multi-center study aimed at evaluating the accuracy, performance, and reliability of AI-assisted EGGIM scoring.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Eligible patients will undergo independent EGGIM score assessment by both endoscopists and the AI system.
Time frame: 1 year
The performance of the AI system will be evaluated in diagnosing the grade of gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) based on the Endoscopic Grading of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (EGGIM) system. EGGIM is a validated scoring method ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting the extent of IM across five gastric regions: two in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one at the incisura. Each region is scored as 0 (no IM), 1 (focal IM, ≤30% of the area), or 2 (extensive IM, >30% of the area), with a total possible score of 10. Higher EGGIM scores correspond to more severe IM and greater gastric cancer risk. The AI-derived scores will be compared with expert' EGGIM scores, which serve as the gold standard, to assess diagnostic accuracy.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05464108
Artificial Intelligence, Endoscopy
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04191551
Atrophic Gastritis, Digestive System Diseases
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06075199
Intestinal Metaplasia of Gastric Mucosa
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06316882
Atrophic Gastritis, Digestive System Diseases
Portalegre, Portalegre District, Portugal
View Trial Details