Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental
Lisbon, 1700-348, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT03663036
An irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) is a challenge, with a controversial definition and different treatment options. None of the latter are exempt of limitations and their survivorship is one of the concerns. In 2013, Mihata et al. proposed a novel treatment option: arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using a fascia lata autograft (FL-ASCR) harvested through an open approach. Although no harvest site dysfunction was reported, concerns about donor site morbidity discouraged the use of this type of graft. In 2015, the investigators modified the original FL-ASCR introducing a minimally invasive fascia lata harvesting technique, aiming to reproduce FL-ASCR's promising clinical results in IRCT, while reducing donor site morbidity.
The investigators aim to: 1) Evaluate the mid-term outcomes and donor site morbidity impact of FL-ASCR with minimally invasive harvesting; 2) Analyze the mid-term graft integrity to determine its survivorship 3) Establish clinical and imaging graft integrity correlations to guide the future treatment algorithm.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lisbon, 1700-348, Portugal
Task 1 - Prospective evaluation of:
Therefore, the FL-ASCR patients included in this study will have completed the preoperative, 6-month and 2-year postoperative evaluations and will undergo a 3-year postoperative evaluation of:
Task 2 - Analysis of the mid-term graft integrity on the 3-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the graft mid-term survivorship
The objective of this task is to determine the 3-year postoperative survivorship of the graft, establishing the fascia lata superior capsular graft tearing rate and the most frequent site of graft failure at 3 years. A 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens Magnetom, U.S.A.) will be used to acquire images in the coronal [proton density fat-saturated (PD FAT-SAT) and T1-weighted], sagittal (PD FAT-SAT and T2 FAT-SAT) and axial (T2* and PD) planes. We and, after blinding, two other independent experienced musculoskeletal radiologists will assess the MRI-images from each patient, in order to:
The type of progression of graft integrity will be determined by comparing the 6-month with the 3-year MRI evaluation of the graft survivorship.
Task 3 - Comparative analysis of the clinical, radiological and MRI preoperative and postoperative variables
The objective of this task is to find correlations between the graft survivorship and the results from tasks 1 and 2. The aim is to establish the clinical importance of mid-term graft survivorship.
The investigators will compare the ROM, shoulder strength, SSV, SST, CS and AHI from preoperative to 3 years postoperative; and from 2 years postoperative to 3 years postoperative (paired-samples t-test). The investigators will compare all continuous variables between the group of ASCR patients who underwent an additional onlay partial RCT repair and the group that underwent ASCR without an onlay partial RCT repair, between the anterior acromioplasty-ASCR group and the group that did not undergo an anterior acromioplasty, between the tenotomy-ASCR group and the no-LHBT group, between the preoperative and postoperative AHI<7mm group and the AHI≥7mm group, and between the intact-graft group and the graft-tear group (Mann-Whitney U test). The investigators will compare all categorical variables, including the donor site morbidity and overall subjective outcome results, between the groups (Fisher's exact test).
To determine the repercussion of FL-ASCR and of the graft integrity on the rotator cuff muscle function the investigators will compare the progression of the Goutallier classification of each rotator cuff muscle from preoperative to 3 years postoperative, as well as the cumulative Goutallier score (the sum of the fatty infiltration stages of the four muscles) and the global fatty muscle degeneration index (the mean value of the grades for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis), between the intact-graft group and the graft-tear group.
A significant difference will be defined as P<0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinical and radiological assessments of the shoulders and the donor sites
Other names: Shoulder radiograph, Range of motion and strength measurements
Time frame: 2 years
Bilateral shoulder active range of motion (ROM): elevation (0 -180º), abduction (0 -180º) and external rotation (0 -100º), measured in degrees ; and internal rotation, defined as the highest vertebral body that the patient's thumb can reach, converted afterwards to a scale of 1-5 points: lateral thigh=0; buttock=1; sacrum=2; lumbar=3; 12th thoracic vertebra=4; 7th thoracic vertebra=5.). Bilateral functional shoulder scores: the simple shoulder test (SST, 1-12 points), the subjective shoulder value (SSV, 0-100%) and the constant score (CS, 1-100 points). Bilateral shoulder strength (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and teres minor, 0 -15 kg). For every scale range provided, higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: 2 years
Analysis of the mid-term graft integrity on the 3-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (scale: 0 -1): 0 = graft absent or not healed to the greater tuberosity/superior glenoid; 1 = graft present and healed to the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid. For the scale range provided, higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: 2 years
Three closed-ended questions to assess the donor site morbidity's impact on the patient's overall satisfaction of the surgical procedure will be asked to the participants: "Does the harvested thigh bother you?" (scale: , "Does your shoulder surgery's end result compensate for your thigh's changes?" (scale: 0 - 1; 0 = no, 1 = yes), "Would you undergo the same surgery again?" (scale: 0 - 1; 0 = no, 1 = yes). The participants will be asked, in a closed-ended questionnaire, if they noticed any of the following donor site changes: deformity (scale: 0 - 1; 0 = no, 1 = yes), pain (scale: 0 -1; 0 = no, 1 = yes), numbness (scale: 0 - 1; 0 = no, 1 = yes)and specific donor site-related claudication (scale: 0 -1; 0 = no, 1 = yes). For every scale range provided, higher values represent a better outcome.
Clara Isabel de Campos Azevedo
Other
Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Minimally Invasive Harvested Fascia Lata Autograft - Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of the Autograft Analysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04779957
Graft Failure, Kidney Transplantation
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07200583
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), Graft Failure
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03373227
Behavior, Compliance, Patient
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06340607
Acute Kidney Injury, Chronic Disease
Seoul, Song-pa Gu, South Korea
View Trial Details