NCT Number: NCT00486694
Artesunate Plus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Versus Chloroquine for Vivax Malaria
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the proposed first line treatment for falciparum malaria in this region (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine + artesunate) would be no worse a treatment for vivax malaria that the standard vivax treatment of chloroquine. In areas where vivax and falciparum malaria co-exist misdiagnosis of vivax malaria as falciparum is not unlikely; it is important to know whether adequate treatment will be received in these cases.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
2 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
About this study
In areas co-endemic for falciparum and vivax malaria incorrect differential diagnosis is always a risk. Where the recommended treatment for the two diseases is the same this presents no problem for effective treatment or clinical cure of either species. Chloroquine remains an effective treatment of choice for vivax malaria in most settings, but with the spread of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria across Asia, many countries now use artemisinin-based combination therapy for this species of malaria. Differential diagnostic practices, have not improved in parallel. In Afghanistan the adoption of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate (SP+AS) as first-line falciparum treatment raises the prospect of a significant proportion of vivax malaria being misdiagnosed and treated with the combination. SP is considered to have limited efficacy against vivax malaria and the efficacy of SP+AS against vivax has not been established in areas that have made the switch. A randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing SP+AS (1 day SP, 3 days AS) to chloroquine monotherapy was undertaken on 190 vivax patients in Eastern Afghanistan. A margin of equivalence of 14%, with 90% power and 95% CI (two-sided α = 0.05) was used. Standard WHO procedures for in vivo evaluation of antimalarial drugs were followed. 180 individuals completed the trial to day 42. The primary outcome was proportion of patients free from failure at day 28. Using a per protocol analysis both regimens resulted in ≥96% treatment success at 28 days, but significantly more cases failed in the CQ arm (46%) than in the SP+AS arm (24%) by day 42. Based on predetermined statistical criteria SP+AS was shown to be non-inferior to the standard chloroquine treatment. In areas where vivax infections might be misdiagnosed as falciparum infections and treated with SP+AS, patient management would be as good or better than with the standard CQ treatment.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- microscopy confirmed P. vivax mono-infection
- age >2 years
- weight >5kg
- >1 asexual parasite per 10 fields
Exclusion criteria
- pregnant
- evidence of concomitant infection or serious disease
- recent use of antimalarial drugs
- severe malaria
- known allergy to study drugs
Treatment and study plan
Chloroquine
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Proportion of patients with parasitological cure up to day 28 after treatment (defined as clearance of circulating vivax parasites by day 7 and absence until end of follow-up).
Secondary outcomes
-
Parasite and fever clearance times, the proportion of patients free of parasites at 42 days, and the proportion of patients with detectable gametocytes during follow-up.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Other
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Plus Artesunate Compared to Chloroquine for the Treatment of Vivax Malaria in Eastern Afghanistan.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2004
- Study completion
- 2004
- First posted
- Jun 15, 2007
- Registry last updated
- Jun 15, 2007
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Radical Cure (RC) With Tafenoquine or Primaquine After Semi-quantitative G6PD Testing: A Feasibility Study in Peru
NCT05361486
Infections, Malaria
Nauta, Loreto, Peru
View Trial DetailsVivax Elimination With Tafenoquine (VET) Study
NCT06575647
Infections, Malaria
Mae Sot, Changwat Tak, Thailand
View Trial DetailsRadical CUREfor MAlaria Among Highly Mobile and Hard-to-reach Populations in the Guyanese Shield
NCT05540470
Infections, Malaria
Oiapoque, Amapá, Brazil
View Trial DetailsVAC069: A Study of Blood-stage Controlled Human P. Vivax Infection
NCT03797989
Infections, Malaria
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details