J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
DeviceTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
NCT Number: NCT07453407
The overall purpose of ART trial is to establish the Safety and Efficacy of the J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Grade≥3+ Native Aortic Regurgitation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device
Time frame: 12 months
All-cause mortality at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Number of patients with stroke
Time frame: 12 months
Number of patients who had unplanned cardiac rehospitalization
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing the onset of atrial fibrillation in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing echocardiographic effective orifice area in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatched in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing the number of cardiovascular rehospitalizations in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR.
Time frame: Pre-intervention/procedure surgery
Comparing TAVR length of index hospitalization with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing the superiority of the composite primary endpoint and its components in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
Comparing bleeding complications in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Freedom of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
Time frame: 30 days,6 months and years 1, 5, 10
Comparing mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
Comparing stroke (disabling and nondisabling) in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 1 year
Comparing death or stroke in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, and 1 year
Comparing death or disabling strokein TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing major vascular complications in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing other procedural or valve-related complications in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: Exit from procedure room
Comparing technical success in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing device success in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
Comparing myocardial infarction in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
Comparing coronary obstruction requiring intervention in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing acute kidney injury in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 1 year
Comparing renal replacement therapy in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
Comparing new permanent pacemaker implantation in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days,6 months and 1 year
Comparing conduction disturbance and arrhythmias in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, and 10
Comparing change in New York Heart Association class in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and at years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
Comparing hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
Comparing other echocardiographic parameters in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
Comparing cardiovascular rehospitalizations( the time to first event and number of events) in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: Time from immediate post-operation to ICU discharge
Comparing ICU days in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
Comparing redo valve replacement in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days,6 months, and 1year
Comparing change in six-minute walk test in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 Days,6 months,1 year
Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 30 days
Comparing early safety in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 1 year, and annually until 10 years
Comparing clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR
Time frame: 5 years and thereafter until 10 years
Comparing valve related long-term clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Other
J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients With Aortic Regurgitation Therapy
Acronym: ART
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06608823
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation
Burlingame, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06594705
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04415047
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05714293
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis, Severe
Roma, Italy
View Trial Details