Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07453407

ART Trial: Transcatheter J-VALVE Versus Surgery for Aortic Regurgitation Therapy

The overall purpose of ART trial is to establish the Safety and Efficacy of the J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Grade≥3+ Native Aortic Regurgitation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1) Age ≥65 years;
  • 2) a. Symptomatic patients with severe AR b. Asymptomatic patients with severe AR and evidence of LV function impairment (per current ESC / ACC guidelines) Any of the following perimeters
  • LVEF ≤55%
  • LVESD >50 mm
  • LVESDi >22 mm/m2
  • LVESVi >45 mL/m2
  • normal LV systolic function at rest (LVEF >55%), and a progressive decline in LVEF on at least 3 serial studies to the low-normal range (LVEF 55% to 60%) or a progressive increase in LV dilation into the severe range (LV end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD] >65 mm),
  • 3) Evaluated by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be suitable for both surgery and transcatheter valve replacement
  • 4) Informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, has provided written informed consent, and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Confirmed moderate or less AR severity (Grade≤2+) by core laboratory evaluation
  • 2. Moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis
  • 3. Mixed with clinical relevant severe mitral or tricuspid disease that require valve intervention
  • 4. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position. (of note, mitral ring is not an exclusion)
  • 5. Subject is high-risk for SAVR as determined by the local heart team
  • 6. Subject refuses SAVR as a treatment option
  • 7. Subject is selected for aortic valve repair or aortic surgery
  • 8. Need for emergency surgery or TAVR for any reason
  • 9. Anatomical exclusion criteria (ANY of the following):
  • Aortic Annulus Perimeter <53 mm or >94 mm measured by CT
  • Maximal ascending aortic diameter ≥50 mm
  • Congenital aortic valve disease including unicuspid, bicuspid, or quadricuspid aortic valve anatomy
  • Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath (e.g., calcification, tortuosity).
  • Significant abdominal or thoracic aortic disease (such as porcelain aorta, severe calcification, aortic coarctation, etc.) that preclude safe passage of the delivery system or cannulation and aortotomy for surgical AVR.
  • 10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit
  • 11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation within 30 days of the screening visit
  • 12. Any condition considered a contraindication to mechanical circulatory support
  • 13. Hostile chest or conditions or complications from prior surgery that preclude safe reoperation (e.g., mediastinitis, radiation damage, abnormal chest wall, adhesion of aorta or IMA to sternum, etc.)
  • 14. Subject refuses blood transfusion
  • 15. Marfan syndrome or other known connective tissue disease that would necessitate aortic root replacement/intervention
  • 16. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the screening visit
  • 17. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days of the screening visit (Subjects with placement of coronary or peripheral stent(s) should be assessed for the ability to safely proceed with SAVR within the protocol timeframe)
  • 18. Complex coronary artery disease (one of the following):
  • Unprotected left main coronary artery disease ≥50%
  • True bifurcation lesion (Medina: 1.1.1) and the diameter of the branch vessels is >2.5 mm
  • Chronic total occlusion (CTO)
  • Long lesion, expected stent length >38 mm
  • Multivessel lesion (at least 2 coronary arteries require interventional treatment)
  • Need to use multiple stents (planned > 3 stents)
  • Lesion with in-stent restenosis
  • Severe calcification lesion
  • Coronary ostial lesion
  • Heart Team assessment that optimal revascularization cannot be performed with either CABG at the time of SAVR or PCI at the time of TAVR.
  • 19. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or carotid intervention within 30 days of the screening visit
  • 20. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the screening visit
  • 21. Severe left ventricular dysfunction, defined as a resting left ventricular ejection fraction <25%; or left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) >70 mm; or the presence of an artificial heart or left ventricular assist device; or being listed for heart transplantation or status post heart transplantation.
  • 22. Moderate to severe or worse right ventricular dysfunction on resting echocardiogram according to core laboratory
  • 23. Cardiac imaging (echocardiography, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • 24. Left atrial thrombus without continuous appropriate anticoagulation within 90 days of the study procedure
  • 25. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (i.e., resting heart rate >120 bpm)
  • 26. Hemodynamically significant hypertrophic Obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), Peak LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg (resting or provoked) ESC 2022/ ACC 2020
  • 27. Untread Leukopenia (WBC<3.0*109/L), Untread Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count <50*109), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia (hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL)
  • 28. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1 <50% predicted) or currently on home oxygen
  • 29. Severe pulmonary hypertension (e.g., PA systolic pressure ≥2/3 systemic pressure)
  • 30. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh C) or any active liver disease
  • 31. Renal insufficiency (eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m²) and/or requiring chronic peritoneal dialysis at the time of screening and/or requiring chronic hemodialysis at the time of screening
  • 32. Ongoing sepsis or active infective endocarditis with ongoing antibiotic (including suppressive) therapy or positive blood cultures within 6 weeks
  • 33. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), implant-related materials, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  • 34. Inability to tolerate anti-thrombotic/anticoagulation therapy during or after the valve implant procedure
  • 35. Active gastrointestinal bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
  • 36. BMI >50 kg/m2 or <18.5 kg/m2
  • 37. Estimated life expectancy <24 months due to associated non- cardiac comorbid conditions
  • 38. Immobility that would prevent completion of study procedures
  • 39. Currently participating in a cardiovascular investigational drug or another device study and not yet completed follow-up for the primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary
  • 40. Severe cognitive decline (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits)
  • 41. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant (women suspected of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum or urine test for human chorionic gonadotropin before being included in the study)
  • 42. Other patients considered unsuitable for this clinical study by the investigator

Treatment and study plan

J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system

Device

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system

Commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device

Device

Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

    All-cause mortality at 12 months

  2. All stroke

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of patients with stroke

  3. Unplanned cardiac rehospitalization

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of patients who had unplanned cardiac rehospitalization

Secondary outcomes

  1. New-onset atrial fibrillation

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing the onset of atrial fibrillation in TAVR with SAVR

  2. Echocardiographic effective orifice area

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing echocardiographic effective orifice area in TAVR with SAVR

  3. Moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatch as measured by echocardiography

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatched in TAVR with SAVR

  4. Cardiovascular rehospitalization

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing the number of cardiovascular rehospitalizations in TAVR with SAVR

  5. Health-related quality of life assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR.

  6. Length of index hospitalization

    Time frame: Pre-intervention/procedure surgery

    Comparing TAVR length of index hospitalization with SAVR

  7. Composite primary endpoints

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing the superiority of the composite primary endpoint and its components in TAVR with SAVR

Other outcomes

  1. Bleeding complications (life-threatening, disabling, or major)

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year

    Comparing bleeding complications in TAVR with SAVR

  2. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)

    Time frame: years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

    Freedom of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events

  3. Mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular)

    Time frame: 30 days,6 months and years 1, 5, 10

    Comparing mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular in TAVR with SAVR

  4. Stroke (disabling and nondisabling)

    Time frame: 30days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10

    Comparing stroke (disabling and nondisabling) in TAVR with SAVR

  5. Death or stroke

    Time frame: 1 year

    Comparing death or stroke in TAVR with SAVR

  6. Death or disabling stroke

    Time frame: 30 days, and 1 year

    Comparing death or disabling strokein TAVR with SAVR

  7. Major vascular complications

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing major vascular complications in TAVR with SAVR

  8. Other procedural or valve-related complications

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing other procedural or valve-related complications in TAVR with SAVR

  9. Technical success

    Time frame: Exit from procedure room

    Comparing technical success in TAVR with SAVR

  10. Device success

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing device success in TAVR with SAVR

  11. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year

    Comparing myocardial infarction in TAVR with SAVR

  12. Coronary obstruction requiring intervention

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year

    Comparing coronary obstruction requiring intervention in TAVR with SAVR

  13. Acute kidney injury

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing acute kidney injury in TAVR with SAVR

  14. Renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: 1 year

    Comparing renal replacement therapy in TAVR with SAVR

  15. New permanent pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10

    Comparing new permanent pacemaker implantation in TAVR with SAVR

  16. Conduction disturbance and arrhythmias

    Time frame: 30 days,6 months and 1 year

    Comparing conduction disturbance and arrhythmias in TAVR with SAVR

  17. New York Heart Association class

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, and 10

    Comparing change in New York Heart Association class in TAVR with SAVR

  18. Hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and at years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.

    Comparing hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography in TAVR with SAVR

  19. Other echocardiographic parameters

    Time frame: 30 days, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.

    Comparing other echocardiographic parameters in TAVR with SAVR

  20. Cardiovascular rehospitalization

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years

    Comparing cardiovascular rehospitalizations( the time to first event and number of events) in TAVR with SAVR

  21. ICU days

    Time frame: Time from immediate post-operation to ICU discharge

    Comparing ICU days in TAVR with SAVR

  22. Redo valve replacement

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years

    Comparing redo valve replacement in TAVR with SAVR

  23. Six-minute walk test

    Time frame: 30 days,6 months, and 1year

    Comparing change in six-minute walk test in TAVR with SAVR

  24. Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by KCCQ-23

    Time frame: 30 Days,6 months,1 year

    Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR

  25. Early safety

    Time frame: 30 days

    Comparing early safety in TAVR with SAVR

  26. Clinical efficacy

    Time frame: 1 year, and annually until 10 years

    Comparing clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR

  27. Valve related long-term clinical efficacy

    Time frame: 5 years and thereafter until 10 years

    Comparing valve related long-term clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jian'an Wang, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86-571-8778-4808

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients With Aortic Regurgitation Therapy

Acronym: ART

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2038
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.