NCT Number: NCT03503539
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
The investigators aimed to evaluate whether these parameters could be guides for us in the selection of RIRS or Mini-PNL procedures in kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm.
The patients that have kidney stones smaller than two cm and be planned to undergo surgery were randomized into 2 groups prospectively. RIRS was performed in the RIRS group using a 7.5-F fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscope while Mini-PCNL group was dilated up to 16.5F and mini-PCNL was performed with 12F nephroscopy. Preoperative characteristics, operative and postoperative results were compared in two groups. Thereafter, intra and intergroup comparisons were made to determine the effects of HU value, indicating the stone density, higher or less than 677 and the stone location on stone-free rates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients were evaluated with non-contrast abdominopelvic CT after a detailed anamnesis and physical examination.
- Patients, who had a kidney stone with a maximum diameter of less than 2 cm and who did not prefer to undergo ESWL, were taken into the study.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with anomalous kidneys, skeletal deformities, severe obesity (BMI> 35) and those underwent ESWL treatment previously for the same stone were excluded from the study.
Treatment and study plan
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Stone free rate
Time frame: 1 year
Stone-free conditions were determined by low-dose spiral CT taken in postoperative third month
Secondary outcomes
-
Mean fluoroscopy time
Time frame: İntraoperative duration of flouroscopy
İntraoperative duration of flouroscopy time
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters That Can Determine the Endourological Surgical Technique for Kidney Stones That Are Smaller Than 2 cm? Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Apr 20, 2018
- Registry last updated
- Apr 20, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD)
NCT05701098
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsStandard vs Mini-PCNL for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04069013
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsEvaluating the Vitamin K2 Status of Calcium-based Stone Formers
NCT05081960
Calcium Oxalate Kidney Stones, Calcium Oxalate Urolithiasis
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsEvaluation of Infection in Obstructing Urolithiasis
NCT04332861
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial Details