Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03893968

Are Doctors and Assistant Nurses Equally Good at Informing Patients

Objectives: to compare patients' recall of information regarding postoperative self-care when being informed by either doctors or assistant nurses.

Methods: a non-blinded randomized single-center controlled trial being conducted at a hand-surgical unit in Northern Sweden. Included are adult ambulatory patients about to undergo surgery in local anesthesia. Patients are randomized into two parallel groups, with the control-group being informed by doctors and the intervention-group by assistant nurses. Patients will be telephoned one week after surgery for assessment of information recall via a structured telephone-interview.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Patient Care

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Norrland's University Hospital

Umeå, Sverige, 90956, Sweden

About this study

The study was conducted within the hand-surgical unit at Norrland's University Hospital in Umeå, county of Västerbotten, in Sweden. There are three hospitals in this sparsely populated county of 55432〖km〗^2 with about 268000 in population. The hand-surgery unit serves both the local population and is a tertiary referral center.

As the healthcare in Sweden is funded by taxpayers, the healthcare for patients is free, apart from a small nominal fee. There was a total of seven doctors and seven assistant nurses participating in the study, all having several years of experience working with hand-surgical care. Prior to the study, doctors had the formal responsibility of informing patients about their postoperative care. However, despite it being the surgeons' responsibility, the task of informing patients was at times performed by assistant nurses. After receiving the information, patients were discharged and left the clinic. Normally patients receive a complementary written information after being informed verbally. Patients included in the study did not receive the written information, since it might have been a confounding factor in understanding of information.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • about to undergo elective hand surgical procedure in local anaesthesia
  • 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

  • does not speak Swedish
  • dementia or other form av cognitive impairment

Treatment and study plan

Information by an assistant nurse

Behavioral

Information received by patients after ambulatory hand surgery under local anaesthetic about postoperative self care given by an assistent nurse.

Information by a doctor

Behavioral

Information received by patients after ambulatory hand surgery under local anaesthetic about postoperative self care given by a doctor.

Primary outcomes

  1. Information recall

    Time frame: 1 week after surgery

    A telephone-interviews were performed seven days after the surgery using a structured questionnaire. For the main objective, seven questions were asked testing patients recall/knowledge of their postoperative self-care. Each question evaluated the patients' knowledge of a unique aspect of postoperative self-care. The questionnaire is designed based on the postoperative info sheet received by patients after hand surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stress and satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 week after surgery

    During the telephone interview the patients could rate on a 1-10 scale their level of "feeling of understood the information", stress, and satisfaction. "Feeling of having understood the information" means the patients perception of having fully understood all the information and knowing fully what to do when leaving the hospital. For assessing "stress", the interviewer asked about the level of stress that the patient had experienced during the week following the surgery. Regarding "satisfaction", the interviewer asked and assessed how satisfied the patients were with the way the personnel had informed the patient (e.g. not used difficult or confusing language, had given the patient time to ask questions etc).

  2. Additional healthcare contacts

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

    Compare differences in the number of healthcare contacts due to not being able to recall or having understood information.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Umeå University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Are Doctors and Assistant Nurses Equally Good at Informing Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Information Recall Regarding Postoperative Self-care

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 28, 2019
Registry last updated
Mar 28, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.