VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
NCT Number: NCT01843777
The purpose of this study is to compare two different ways of helping first-time hearing-aid users get the most out of their hearing aids and determine if one method is better than the other. One method provides the patient with routine information regarding the care and use of hearing aids the other method uses tools to address patient-specific barriers against and motivators for hearing-aid use.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Failure to satisfy any of the requirements listed as inclusion criteria
the standard of care in audiologic practice
motivational interviewing
Other names: Motivational Interviewing
Time frame: Collected pre-intervention and again at post-intervention appointment occurring between four and six weeks after the intervention date
Hearing aid use was measured by the number of hours of use recorded in the hearing-aid software. This was measured on up to four occasions: Visit #1 to #3 (pre-intervention), and Visit #4 (post-intervention). Average daily hours of hearing aid use was documented at each time point, so that the Visit #4 observation is a measure of the average daily use between the start of intervention (Visit #3) and visit #4. Data logger results were averaged between the left and right hearing aids at each time point and across all three pre-intervention time points.
Time frame: Collected twice once at pre-intervention visit and once at a post-intervention visit occurring four to six weeks following the intervention
The total score from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA; Cox et al., 2000) was used to assess overall hearing-aid outcome. This measure consists of seven items assessing (1) daily hearing-aid use, (2) benefit, (3) residual activity limitation, (4) satisfaction, (5) residual participation restriction, (6) impact (of hearing impairment) on others, and (7) quality of Life. Responses to each question range from 1 (poorest) to 5 (best), for a total score range from 7 points to 35 points. The reported measurement was the change in total score from pre-intervention to post-intervention, with a maximum possible change of 28 points.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05219474
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01805167
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05070429
Aging, Ear Diseases
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07501312
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Aurora, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details