St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03176251
Simulation-based training curricula for gastrointestinal endoscopy have been developed and have been shown to be effective. It is possible that these curricula may be further improved. Gamification, the application of game-design principles to non-game contexts, has been shown to improve learning and skill performance in medical education. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, however, no dedicated curricula have been developed using gamification principles. We aim to evaluate the impact of applying gamification to a curriculum using SBT in endoscopy on clinical performance, compared to an identical curriculum without gamification. 36 novice endoscopists from the general surgery and gastroenterology programs at the University of Toronto will be recruited. Participants will be randomized into two groups: the Conventional Training Curriculum (CTC) Group, in which participants will receive 6 hours of training on a simulator augmented with expert feedback and interlaced with 4 hours of didactic training on the theory of colonoscopy; and the Gamified Integrated Curriculum (GIC) Group, in which participants will receive the same curriculum, using the following applications of gamified learning: a leaderboard of participant performances; badges for achievement of training landmarks; and rewards for top performance. Participants will be trained to perform colonoscopies progressively moving from a low to high complexity simulators, starting with the bench-top model (1 hour) and then moving to the EndoVR® virtual reality (VR) gastroenterology simulator (5 hours). Performance will be assessed at three points: prior to training (pre-test), immediately after training (acquisition post-test) and 4-6 weeks after training (retention test). Assessment will take place on the simulator at all three time points and during two live colonoscopies at the retention test. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in clinical colonoscopy performance between the two training groups, as assessed by the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS). We aim to have data collection finished by 2018. Our results have the potential to improve existing curricula for training in colonoscopy. Moreover, the development of a gamified curriculum in procedural skills may have applicability to other specialities, such as general surgery and anesthesiology.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group will receive identical training compared to the control group, with the additional incorporation of several elements of gamification, as outlined in the Arm/Group descriptions.
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Difference between the control and intervention groups during two clinical colonoscopies as assessed by two independent, blinded, expert endoscopists using the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS)
Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
Differences between the two groups with respect to procedural knowledge as assessed by multiple-choice questionnaires
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Differences between the two groups with respect to non-technical performance during clinical colonoscopies and an integrated scenario format test 4-6 weeks after training, as assessed by the modified objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills (M-OSANTS)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Differences between the two groups with respect to patient comfort during the clinical colonoscopies, as assessed by the Nurse-Assessed Patient Comfort Score (NAPCOMS)
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Differences between the two groups with respect to participant self-efficacy, as measured by an adapted scale based on the General Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Differences between the two groups with respect to cognitive load, as measured by the Cognitive Load Scale for Colonoscopy
Time frame: Immediate post-intervention and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Difference between the two groups with respect to technical performance on a VR simulated colonoscopies as assessed through the JAG/DOPS
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Difference between the two groups with respect to competitiveness as measured using the Revised Competitiveness Index
Unity Health Toronto
Other
Gamification of a Virtual-reality Simulation Curriculum in Endoscopy: Impact on Clinical Performance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04247399
Education, Endoscopy
Odense, Region Syddanmark, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04186390
Education, Endoscopy
Odense, Region Syddanmark, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04150237
Education, Endoscopy
Odense, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04660214
Digestive System Diseases, Diverticular Diseases
Valladolid, Spain
View Trial Details