Los Angeles County Department of Health Services
Los Angeles, California, 90012, United States
NCT Number: NCT03784950
Using behavioral economics, the study objective is to increase the efficiency, quality, and timeliness of care for Los Angeles County (LAC) Department of Health Services (DHS) patients by nudging specialists toward more effective use of eConsult, a web-based consultation and communication portal for Primary Care Providers (PCPs) and specialists, improving access for patients in greatest need of specialty care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Los Angeles, California, 90012, United States
Historically, the Los Angeles County (LAC) Department of Health Services (DHS) Safety Net system has faced challenges in delivering specialty services that are timely, geographically equitable, and coordinated in a patient centered manner. Recently, LACDHS improved infrastructure through implementation of eConsult, a web-based consultation and communication portal for Primary Care Providers (PCPs) and specialists, improving access for patients in greatest need of specialty care. The study investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized trial with the goal of increasing the efficiency, quality, and timeliness of care for LACDHS patients by nudging specialists toward more effective use of eConsult. If successful, these nudges may reduce the number and increase the value of face-to-face consults.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
eConsult Specialty Reviewers are asked to rate the quality of other specialists' recently completed eConsult exchanges on the following four dimensions: 1) efforts to elicit additional information from PCPs, when needed; 2) medical decision making; 3) inclusion of educational content for PCPs, when appropriate; 4) perceived effect on the PCP-specialist relationship (i.e., overall tone of the eConsult exchange)
eConsult Specialty Reviewers receive confidential feedback via email on their performance (top performer vs not a top performer) as compared to colleagues in their specialty. Feedback is based on other reviewers ratings of their eConsult exchanges on the following four dimensions: 1) efforts to elicit additional information from PCPs, when needed; 2) medical decision making; 3) inclusion of educational content for PCPs, when appropriate; 4) perceived effect on the PCP-specialist relationship (i.e., overall tone of the eConsult exchange)
Time frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention, up to 12 months
Peers' ratings of Medical Decision Making in Specialists' responses to PCPs
Time frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention, up to 12 months
Peers' ratings of Expected Practices in Specialists' responses to PCPs
Time frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention, up to 12 months
Peers' ratings Relationship Building in Specialists' responses to PCPs
Time frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention, up to 12 months
Peers' ratings of Specialists' skill in elicitation of information from PCPs
Time frame: Baseline to Post-Intervention, up to 12 months
Peers' ratings of Educational Value of eConsults
University of Southern California
Other
Application of Behavioral Economics to Improve the Quality and Value of eConsult Specialty Reviews
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06304831
Quality of Health Care
Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Laos
View Trial DetailsNCT04107233
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05657002
Clinical Decision-making, Data Accuracy
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04845698
Behavior, Communication
Tainan, Taiwan, R.o.c, Taiwan
View Trial Details