Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05311384

Application of a Reimbursable Form of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity

CI therapy is a family of techniques that has systematically applied intensive treatment daily over consecutive days, supervised motor training using a technique called shaping, behavioral strategies to improve the use of the more- affected limb in real life situations called a Transfer Package (TP), and strategies to remind participants to use the more-affected extremity; including restraint of the less-affected arm in the upper extremity (UE) protocol. Numerous studies examining use of CI therapy with UE rehabilitation have demonstrated robust evidence for increasing the amount and the quality of the paretic UE functional use in daily situations of individuals recovering from stroke.

Previous studies have explored the barriers for clinical implementation of the approach, including the amount of time needed by therapists, other resources required and lack of payment for the services. With regards to therapists' time/resources, in the signature CI therapy protocol, therapists supervised movement training for 3 hours daily (except for weekends) for a 12 consecutive-day period. This level of supervision in highly unusual for traditional rehabilitation clinical settings. The treatment schedule is also incompatible with most insurance reimbursement policies in the US. As such, most CI therapy clinics require patients to pay privately with little or no insurance reimbursement. Such practices severely limit the number of patients who can afford to receive CI therapy. Two lines of evidence have suggested that an alternative CI therapy protocol may allow for the essential (or "Key") CI therapy elements to be delivered in a schedule that better utilizes therapist time/resources and is compatible with payment policies of many US insurance companies. One line of evidence comes from findings that indicate that the original 6-hour supervised training schedule could be shortened to as little as 2-hours/daily without a reduction in outcomes. Additional evidence comes from a study exploring the systematic addition and deletion of the signature CI therapy protocol elements indicated that when the transfer package was omitted, outcomes related to functional use were reduced by 50%. These findings were also verified by brain imaging studies conducted concurrently that revealed a much-reduced level of brain remodeling in those not receiving the transfer package. These findings highlight the potential effectiveness of the transfer package and continued movement training by the patient while away from clinical supervision. The hypothesis of this study is that the amount of supervised training could be reduced further and delivered in a distributed schedule (1 to 4 times/ week over an 8-week period) instead of consecutively over a 12-day treatment period. This modification could be possible by adapting and strengthening the transfer package component of the protocol. In order to investigate if all of the Keys intervention protocol is necessary for producing optimal outcomes, the delivery of specific protocol elements will be also explored. Additionally, another round of testing at the 4-week point of the 8-week intervention will be administered to investigate the need for the final 4 weeks of the intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) Brain Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations Paresis Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms Stroke Upper Extremity Paresis Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 6 months after stroke
  • Ability to demonstrate minimum movement criteria of more-affected UE including 10 degrees of wrist extension (starting from a fully flexed position), 10 degrees of thumb abduction, and 10 degrees of extension of two additional fingers at all joints
  • Score <2.5 on the MAL indicating significant functional deficits of the more-affected UE

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to answer the MAL questions and/or provide informed consent
  • Score <24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination
  • No availability to come to the clinic for the sessions.

Treatment and study plan

Keys Constraint-induced Movement Therapy protocol

Behavioral

All participants will receive the Keys CI Therapy protocol over an 8-week intervention period. Specific CI therapy strategies will be delivered, including: 1) supervised movement training will be carried out for 1 hour for 4 days/week for the first 4 weeks, 2 days/week for weeks 5 and 6, and 1 day/week for weeks 7 and 8; 2) participants will use the restraint mitt on their less-affected UE for most of their waking hours for an 8 week period; 3) transfer package methods will be modified to accommodate the longer time period between clinic visits; and 4) participants will be asked to independently perform additional movement training for 30 minutes each day at home.

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor Activity Log (MAL)

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The MAL assesses how much and how well the individuals uses the affected upper extremity in 30 different daily activities. It will be used to investigate the change in spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The MAL includes two scales: Amount of use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) and each one of them is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote more frequent spontaneous use and better quality of movement of the affected arm.

  2. Motor Activity Log (MAL)

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The MAL assesses how much and how well the individuals uses the affected upper extremity in 30 different daily activities. It will be used to investigate the change in spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The MAL includes two scales: Amount of use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) and each one of them is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote more frequent spontaneous use and better quality of movement of the affected arm.

  3. Motor Activity Log (MAL)

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The MAL assesses how much and how well the individuals uses the affected upper extremity in 30 different daily activities. It will be used to investigate the change in spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment.The MAL assesses how much and how well the individuals uses the affected upper extremity in 30 different daily activities. It will be used to investigate the change in spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity before and after the treatment. The assessment is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote more frequent spontaneous use and quality of movement of the affected arm.

  4. Motor Activity Log (MAL)

    Time frame: 3 months after the end of the treatment.

    The MAL assesses how much and how well the individuals uses the affected upper extremity in 30 different daily activities. It will be used to investigate the change in spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The MAL includes two scales: Amount of use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) and each one of them is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote more frequent spontaneous use and better quality of movement of the affected arm.

  5. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The COPM is a self-reported measure regarding the individual's occupational performance in self-care, productivity, and leisure activities. The COPM will be administered to explore the changes in occupational performance comparing the scores collected before, in the middle of the treatment and after the treatment. Five of the activities considered more important to the individuals are scored through two different scales: the performance and the satisfaction scales. Each one is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote higher satisfaction, and quality of performance.

  6. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The COPM is a self-reported measure regarding the individual's occupational performance in self-care, productivity, and leisure activities. The COPM will be administered to explore the changes in occupational performance comparing the scores collected before, in the middle of the treatment and after the treatment. Five of the activities considered more important to the individuals are scored through two different scales: the performance and the satisfaction scales. Each one is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote higher satisfaction, and quality of performance.

  7. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The COPM is a self-reported measure regarding the individual's occupational performance in self-care, productivity, and leisure activities. The COPM will be administered to explore the changes in occupational performance comparing the scores collected before, in the middle of the treatment and after the treatment. Five of the activities considered more important to the individuals are scored through two different scales: the performance and the satisfaction scales. Each one is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote higher satisfaction, and quality of performance.

  8. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    Time frame: 3 months after the end of the treatment.

    The COPM is a self-reported measure regarding the individual's occupational performance in self-care, productivity, and leisure activities. The COPM will be administered to explore the changes in occupational performance comparing the scores collected before, in the middle of the treatment and after the treatment. Five of the activities considered more important to the individuals are scored through two different scales: the performance and the satisfaction scales. Each one is scored from 0-10, and higher scores denote higher satisfaction, and quality of performance.

  9. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Performance Time

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

  10. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Performance Time

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

  11. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Performance Time

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

  12. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Functional Ability Scale

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

  13. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Functional Ability Scale

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

  14. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) - Functional Ability Scale

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The WMFT measures upper extremity motor function in terms of quality of movement and performance time. The WMFT will be administered to investigate changes in motor function of the affected arm comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The WMFT is scored in two different ways: through performance times (in seconds) and quality of performance through the Functional Ability Scale (FAS). The FAS ranges from 0-5, in which 0 represents inability to perform the task, and 5 is given for performances close o before the stroke. The tasks are also timed with a stopwatch and lower performance time denotes better motor function.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The SIS is a self-reported measure of disability and quality of life after stroke. The SIS will be administered to investigate changes in quality of life comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The SIS includes 9 domains and each one of them ranges from 0-100, where lower score mean more difficulty performing the task and lower self-perceived recovery. The domains are: 1) Strength, 2) Memory; 3) Mood; 4) Communication; 5) Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/ Instrumental ADLs (IADLs); 6) Mobility; 7) Hand Function; 8) Participation; and 9) Recovery.

  2. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The SIS is a self-reported measure of disability and quality of life after stroke. The SIS will be administered to investigate changes in quality of life comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The SIS includes 9 domains and each one of them ranges from 0-100, where lower score mean more difficulty performing the task and lower self-perceived recovery. The domains are: 1) Strength, 2) Memory; 3) Mood; 4) Communication; 5) Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/ Instrumental ADLs (IADLs); 6) Mobility; 7) Hand Function; 8) Participation; and 9) Recovery.

  3. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The SIS is a self-reported measure of disability and quality of life after stroke. The SIS will be administered to investigate changes in quality of life comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The SIS includes 9 domains and each one of them ranges from 0-100, where lower score mean more difficulty performing the task and lower self-perceived recovery. The domains are: 1) Strength, 2) Memory; 3) Mood; 4) Communication; 5) Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/ Instrumental ADLs (IADLs); 6) Mobility; 7) Hand Function; 8) Participation; and 9) Recovery.

  4. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    Time frame: 3 months after the end of the treatment.

    The SIS is a self-reported measure of disability and quality of life after stroke. The SIS will be administered to investigate changes in quality of life comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment. The SIS includes 9 domains and each one of them ranges from 0-100, where lower score mean more difficulty performing the task and lower self-perceived recovery. The domains are: 1) Strength, 2) Memory; 3) Mood; 4) Communication; 5) Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/ Instrumental ADLs (IADLs); 6) Mobility; 7) Hand Function; 8) Participation; and 9) Recovery.

  5. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale

    Time frame: Pre-treatment

    The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The final score ranges from 20-80, where scores are classified as normal (<50), mild depression (50 to 59), moderate to marked major depression (60 to 69), and severe to extreme major depression (>70). The ZDS will be administered to investigate changes in depressive symptoms comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment.

  6. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale

    Time frame: 4 weeks after starting the intervention (middle of the protocol)

    The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The final score ranges from 20-80, where scores are classified as normal (<50), mild depression (50 to 59), moderate to marked major depression (60 to 69), and severe to extreme major depression (>70). The ZDS will be administered to investigate changes in depressive symptoms comparing the scores collected before and in the middle of the treatment.

  7. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale

    Time frame: after the intervention (8 weeks after starting the protocol)

    The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The final score ranges from 20-80, where scores are classified as normal (<50), mild depression (50 to 59), moderate to marked major depression (60 to 69), and severe to extreme major depression (>70). The ZDS will be administered to investigate changes in depressive symptoms comparing the scores collected before and after the treatment.

  8. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale

    Time frame: 3 months after the end of the treatment.

    The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The ZDS is a self-reported outcome that measures the presence of specific symptoms related to depression. The final score ranges from 20-80, where scores are classified as normal (<50), mild depression (50 to 59), moderate to marked major depression (60 to 69), and severe to extreme major depression (>70). The ZDS will be administered to investigate changes in depressive symptoms comparing the scores collected right after of the treatment and 3 months after the end of the treatment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Application of a Reimbursable Form of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity Recovery Following Stroke: A Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 5, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 7, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.