Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07393048

Application and Exploration of Personalized ctDNA-MRD Detection Technology in Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer

This study is a single-center, prospective, observational clinical trial enrolling patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4aN0M0 and cT1-4aN1-2M0). By collecting tissue and blood samples at multiple timepoints, and integrating multi-omics data including ctDNA mutations, copy number variations, and mtDNA profiles, a multi-omics model will be constructed to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

HONGWEI YAO, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

13611015609

About this study

This study is a single-center, prospective, observational clinical trial designed to construct and validate a multi-omics-based predictive model for neoadjuvant treatment efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4aN0M0 and cT1-4aN1-2M0) are enrolled, and tissue and blood samples are dynamically collected at multiple time points. By simultaneously analyzing plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) somatic mutations, copy number variations, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), a multi-dimensional molecular biomarker system is constructed.The primary objectives of the study include: first, prospectively validating the efficacy of a multi-dimensional molecular biomarker model based on ctDNA mutations, mtDNA, and copy number variations for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) during neoadjuvant therapy and assessing its sensitivity and specificity in predicting pathological response; second, comparing the sensitivity and specificity of different omics features-ctDNA mutations, mtDNA, copy number variations, alone or in combination-in predicting treatment efficacy after surgery.The secondary objectives are: first, to construct a multi-omics model integrating ctDNA mutations, copy number variations, and mtDNA for dynamically assessing tumor burden changes during neoadjuvant therapy; second, to explore and optimize ctDNA-MRD detection technology, aiming to overcome the high sample volume requirements of traditional methods and improve the detection rate of low-abundance ctDNA.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1: Signed a written informed consent form and voluntarily participated in this study
  • 2: Aged 18-75 years, regardless of sex
  • 3: Histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma
  • 4: Clinical stage II-III as assessed by MRI (according to the AJCC 8th edition)
  • 5: Distance from the lower tumor margin to the anal verge ≤10 cm
  • 6: Surgically resectable
  • 7: Able to swallow tablets normally
  • 8: ECOG PS 0-1
  • 9: No prior antitumor therapy for rectal cancer, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery
  • 10: Scheduled to undergo surgical treatment after completion of neoadjuvant therapy
  • 11: No surgical contraindications
  • 12: Normal function of major organs, including: complete blood count, blood biochemistry, and coagulation function

Exclusion criteria

  • 1: History of allergy to monoclonal antibodies, any component of tislelizumab, or capecitabine
  • 2: Prior or ongoing receipt of any tumor-directed surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc
  • 3: Presence of any active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease
  • 4: History of immunodeficiency, including a positive HIV test result, other acquired or congenital immunodeficiency disorders, or history of organ transplantation or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
  • 5: Poorly controlled cardiac clinical symptoms or diseases, including but not limited to: heart failure of NYHA class II or above, unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the past year, or clinically significant supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia that remains poorly controlled without or despite clinical intervention
  • 6: Diagnosis of another malignancy within 5 years prior to the first use of the study drug, except for malignancies with low risk of metastasis or death (5-year survival rate >90%), such as adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix, which may be considered for inclusion
  • 7: Pregnant or lactating women
  • 8: Other factors, as judged by the investigator, that may lead to premature termination of the study, such as other severe diseases (including psychiatric disorders) requiring concomitant treatment, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, family or social factors, or any condition that may affect the safety or compliance of the participant

Treatment and study plan

Personalized ctDNA-MRD Detection

Diagnostic Test

This observational study involves collecting clinical data and biospecimens (peripheral blood and tissue samples) from participants at multiple timepoints. Personalized ctDNA-MRD detection technology, together with copy number variation and mtDNA profiling, is applied to analyze the samples. The primary goal is to predict neoadjuvant therapy efficacy by identifying biomarkers associated with key outcomes, such as tumor regression grade and pathological complete response rate. No experimental drugs or treatments are administered.

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Response (CR) rate

    Time frame: Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)

    The proportion of patients confirmed to have achieved complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, as assessed by endoscopy, imaging (pelvic MRI/chest-abdominal CT), digital rectal examination, and pathological evaluation. The assessment time point corresponds to T2 (8-14 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant therapy). Complete response requires: normal mucosa on endoscopy with negative biopsy; no residual tumor on imaging; no palpable mass on digital rectal examination; and no viable tumor cells in postoperative pathology (if surgery is performed).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete Response Rate (CR)

    Time frame: Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)

    The proportion of patients confirmed to have achieved complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, as assessed by endoscopy, imaging (pelvic MRI/chest-abdominal CT), digital rectal examination, and pathological evaluation. The assessment time point corresponds to T2 (8-14 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant therapy). Complete response requires: normal mucosa on endoscopy with negative biopsy; no residual tumor on imaging; no palpable mass on digital rectal examination; and no viable tumor cells in postoperative pathology (if surgery is performed).

  2. Major Pathological Response Rate (MPR)

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

    The proportion of patients with ≤10% residual tumor cells and no lymph node metastasis in postoperative pathological examination, assessed at T3 (1 month after radical resection, corresponding to the technical roadmap).

  3. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Time frame: Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)

    The proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after neoadjuvant therapy, assessed at T2 (8-14 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant therapy). Partial response is defined as a ≥30% reduction in tumor size confirmed by endoscopy and imaging, with no new lesions.

  4. Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

    Time frame: Monitoring Period: Every 3 or 6 months after treatment completion, continued until 1 year.

    The time from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy to disease recurrence (confirmed by endoscopy/imaging), metastasis, or death from any cause, with follow-up through T4 (surveillance period of 3-6 months, optional) and subsequent long-term follow-up nodes as per the technical roadmap.

  5. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From the randomization date to the date of death from any cause, disease recurrence, or metastasis-whichever occurred first-assessed over the entire study period with a planned maximum follow-up of 12 months.

    Time from randomization to death from any cause, recurrence, or metastasis. This serves as a gold-standard endpoint for assessing the long-term efficacy of anticancer therapy.

  6. Organ Preservation Rate (OPR)

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

    The proportion of patients who avoid radical surgery and retain anal function and rectal organ integrity after neoadjuvant therapy, assessed at T3 (1 month after surgery for operated patients, or 1 month after treatment plan confirmation for non-operated patients, corresponding to the technical roadmap).

  7. Neoadjuvant Therapy Score for Rectal Cancer (NAR)

    Time frame: Post-neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy Assessment Time Point (within 8-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion)

    At T2 (8-14 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant therapy), the patient's response to neoadjuvant therapy is evaluated using a standardized scoring system that integrates endoscopic findings, imaging regression, and tumor marker levels.

  8. Quality of Life (QoL)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), within 2 weeks after completion of radiotherapy (T1), 8-12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy (T2), and 4 weeks after surgery or after final treatment regimen determination (T3), through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) to evaluate physical function, psychological status, and bowel-related quality of life. The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses a 0-100 scale where higher scores in functional domains indicate better function, and higher scores in symptom domains indicate worse symptoms. The EORTC QLQ-CR29 uses a 0-100 scale where higher scores in symptom domains indicate worse bowel/rectal symptoms.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Yao Hongwei Professor, Doctoral Degree

CONTACT

[email protected]

13611015609

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Other

Registry information

Acronym: ctDNA-MRD-RC

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.