ApneaLink Air
Diagnostic TestApneaLink Air to be used on each participant undergoing PSG
NCT Number: NCT03470493
This study compares the diagnostic capability of a home sleep apnea testing device to polysomnography.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
The current gold standard for sleep disordered breathing (SDB) diagnosis is in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG). A barrier of acceptance of Home Sleep Apnea Testing (HSAT) devices as a diagnostic test is their inability to accurately measure total sleep time (TST). A novel algorithm developed by ResMed, Ltd. allows the AL device to accurately calculate TST, however, this algorithm has not yet been validated.
The ApneaLink Air (AL) device is a type III HSAT device. The device is capable of recording up to four channels of data including: flow and snore via a nasal cannula attached to a pressure transducer, a respiratory effort belt, a pulse oximeter to measure pulse and oxygen saturation, and an actigraphy monitor to measure TST along with flow. The AL device has been validated against PSG for AHI, and Cheyne-Stoke respiration detection . Further validation of the effort belt is necessary to determine the accuracy of the AL ability to differentiate between obstructive and central apneic events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ApneaLink Air to be used on each participant undergoing PSG
Time frame: Day 1
The Respiratory Event Index (REI) provided by the AL will be compared with the REI provided by the PSG test. REI will be scored according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 guidelines.
The REI provided by the AL for each participant is divided by the REI provided by the PSG for the same participant to get the diagnostic sensitivity of the Apnealink.
Time frame: Day 1
Total number of Obstructive events reported by the ApneaLink (AL) compared with total number of Obstructive Events reported by polysomnography (PSG). The Obstructive events of the AL are divided by the Obstructive events of the PSG to get the diagnostic sensitivity. This is then compared with the threshold of 0.825
Time frame: Day 1
Total number of Central events reported by the ApneaLink (AL) compared with total number of Central Events reported by polysomnography (PSG). The Central events of the AL are divided by the Central events of the PSG to get the diagnostic sensitivity. This is then compared with the threshold of 0.825
Time frame: Day 1
The positive likelihood ratio (the estimated sensitivity divided by 1 minus the estimated specificity) was calculated along with the associated one-sided 97.5% confidence interval. The positive likelihood ratio was compared with the threshold of 5 (AASM criteria for out-of-center testing devices12) using a Wald test.
ResMed
Industry
Comparison of the ApneaLink Air Home Sleep Testing Device to Polysomnography
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06498531
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
View Trial DetailsNCT06498544
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
View Trial DetailsNCT04251806
Apnea, Congenital Abnormalities
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04885062
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details