Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
NCT Number: NCT03379246
This is a retrospective chart review using TriHealth Electronic Privacy Identification Center (EPIC) to determine whether gynecologic surgeons at a large community hospital are already meeting the recently recommended best practice of supporting the vaginal apex.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the United States is estimated to be between 40-50% with an anticipated increase over the next several decades. Approximately 300,000 women undergo surgeries to repair POP in the United States every year. Following pelvic reconstructive surgery, recurrence rates of symptomatic prolapse range between 6-30%. Our understanding of pelvic anatomy and its support has been significantly improved over recent decades, with many researchers reporting on details and mechanics previously not understood.
In November 2017, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a new practice bulletin outlining the current standard of care for the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse. In this bulletin, they state that a hysterectomy alone is not adequate treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, and further that any woman having a hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse should undergo a concurrent apical suspension procedure as a standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of patients already meeting the recently recommended best practice of supporting the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse among the population who underwent the surgery performed at a TriHealth facility between October 2012 and October 2017.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: at time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
proportion of patients who had concurrent apical support procedures performed
TriHealth Inc.
Other
Are we Supporting the Apex During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02890498
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06532292
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07554651
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Dnipro, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT07552337
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details