Hopital Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France
NCT Number: NCT03976817
Surgical valve replacement is commonly performed in patients with severe aortic valve disease. In small aortic annulus, implantation of bioprosthetic valves can be associated with limited functional capacity. To avoid this condition, we changed our surgical technique to implant a larger bioprosthesis. Briefly, the prosthesis is sutured to the aortic annulus along the left and right coronary sinuses, and in a supraannular position along the noncoronary sinus, therefore allowing us to insert a prosthetic valve with a one-size larger diameter than the native aortic annulus.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France
Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for severe aortic valve disease. Bioprosthesis remains the substitute of choice for elderly patients. However, it may be associated with patient-prosthesis mismatch particularly for patients with small aortic annulus. Moreover, "valve-in-valve" transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a suitable therapeutic option for bioprosthesis structural degeneration, especially in patients with high surgical risk. It is therefore of great importance to implant the widest bioprosthesis as possible at the first AVR. The investigators report a surgical technique allowing the implantation of a larger bioprosthesis in patients with small aortic annulus: the supra-annular aortic valve replacement (SA-AVR) above the aortic annulus. The investigators analyzed the postoperative outcomes of the SA-AVR technique using the Perimount Magna Ease (Carpentier-Edwards, Irvine, California) bioprosthesis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established between the ascending aorta and the right atrium. The aorta was cross-clamped and a high potassium warm cardioplegia was infused and repeated every 15 minutes. The aortotomy was made above the sinuses and the aortic valve was removed. The prosthesis was chosen one size larger than the maximal sizer that could be inserted, which was also used to determine the appropriate height for insertion of the sutures along the wall of the non-coronary sinus.
Time frame: Hospital discharge, an average 10 days
Time frame: 1 year after the surgery
New York Heart Association functional class (from I to IV)
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Other
Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement: Surgical Techniques and Early Outcomes
Acronym: SA-AVR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00465218
Aortic Valve Disease, Brain Diseases
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04909424
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06106451
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Replacement
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01194362
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Plano, Texas, United States
View Trial Details