Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04023604

Antimicrobial-free Production of Beef Cattle's Affect on Gut Microbiome

The primary purpose of this study is to assess whether consuming foods from animals raised with antimicrobial medications influences gut health in adults between the ages of 21-69 years old. Antimicrobial medications are commonly used to help animals avoid infections while growing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

21 year–69 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept. Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University

West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, United States

About this study

The researchers plan to investigate differences in the resistome (i.e., populations of antimicrobial resistance genes) and microbiome (populations of bacteria) in feces obtained from people when they consume diets containing beef derived from cattle raised conventionally (i.e. using antimicrobial drugs(AMDs)) vs. those produced in raised without antibiotics (RWA) systems. In addition, the researchers will investigate whether specific antimicrobial resistant (AMR) genes are transmitted from food to people.

The hypothesis is that beef is not a significant source of resistant bacteria, and there is no difference in the likelihood of gut colonization with resistant bacteria in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally (i.e. using AMDs) vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, 21-69 years old;
  • BMI 22.0-34.9 kg/m2;
  • Fasting serum total cholesterol <240 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <160 mg/dL, triglycerides <400 mg/dL, and glucose <110 mg/dL;
  • Systolic/diastolic blood pressure <140/90 mmHg;
  • Body weight stable (± 4 kg in previous 3 mo);
  • Medication use stable for 6 months prior and not using medications or supplements known to impact gut function;
  • No use of topical, oral or parenteral antibiotic medications in previous 6 months.
  • Non-smoking;
  • Physical activity regimen stable for 3 months prior;
  • Not drinking more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day;
  • No history of gastrointestinal disorders, surgeries or cancers;
  • Non-pregnant and not lactating
  • No acute illness and non-diabetic;
  • Willing and able to consume the prescribed diets that may include meat, dairy and gluten-containing foods and beverages.

Exclusion criteria

  • Male or female, < 20 or >70 years old;
  • BMI < 21.9- >35 kg/m2;
  • Fasting serum total cholesterol >240 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >160 mg/dL, triglycerides >400 mg/dL, and glucose >110 mg/dL;
  • Systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg;
  • Body weight stable for < 3 months prior (±3 kg);
  • Stable physical activity regimen < 3 months prior;
  • Medication use unstable for 6 months prior and using medications or supplements known to impact gut function;
  • Smoking;
  • Drinking more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day;
  • Diabetic;
  • A history of gastrointestinal disorders, GI surgeries or GI cancers;
  • Pregnant or lactating

Treatment and study plan

Controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics

Other

The controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics will follow the Dietary Guidelines for American's recommendations. All foods and beverages will be provided during intervention to achieve the desired eating pattern. Beef included in this diet were raised without antibiotics.

Controlled diet with beef produced in conventional systems

Other

The controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics will follow the Dietary Guidelines for American's recommendations. All foods and beverages will be provided during intervention to achieve the desired eating pattern. Beef included in this diet were raised with antibiotics.

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in the resistome and microbiome

    Time frame: 2 years

    The resistome and microbiome of rinsates will be obtained from dietary components, and feces collected from the particpants. Researchers will sequence all of the published AMR genes. Microbiome data will be obtained from 16s rRNA gene sequencing to produce amplicons of the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes. Statistical analyses will be conducted of microbial features to assess whether microbial/resistome communities diverge between the two groups. Additionally, foodborne transmission of AMR genes with discriminatory SNP("DNA fingerprints") profiles will be investigated through the food chain into dietary trial participants to identify highly discriminatory patterns in individual genes, or discriminatory profiles in gene sets. Hypothesis: beef is not a significant source of resistant bacteria and there is no difference in the likelihood of gut colonization with resistant bacteria in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs beef produced in RWA systems

Secondary outcomes

  1. Level of fasting blood pressure

    Time frame: 2 years

    The hypothesis is that there is no difference in blood pressure in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.

  2. Level of fasting serum insulin

    Time frame: 2 years

    The hypothesis is that there is no difference in fasting serum insulin in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.

  3. Level of fasting serum glucose

    Time frame: 2 years

    The hypothesis is that there is no difference in fasting serum glucose in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.

  4. Size of lipoprotein particle

    Time frame: 2 years

    The hypothesis is that there is no difference in lipoprotein particle size in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems

Other outcomes

  1. Questionnaire score of mood and health and well being

    Time frame: 2 years

    The POMS (Profile of Mood States) Questionnaire is a psychological rating scale to assess distinct mood states. There is a total of 35 questions using a five point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely" indicating the range of mood swings over a period of time.

    The Optum SF-36v2 (Short Form 36 question Version 2) Health Survey measures the functional health and wellbeing of a participant. SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is transformed into a 0-100 scales, with the assumption that each questions carries equal weight (the lower the score the more disability, the higher the score the less disability).

    The hypothesis is that there is no difference in mood and health and wellbeing in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Purdue University

Other

Collaborators

  • Colorado State University
  • University of Minnesota

Registry information

Official study title

Does Antimicrobial-free Production of Beef Cattle Reduce Foodborne Transmission of Resistant Bacteria to Human Consumers?

Acronym: S54

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 17, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 28, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.