Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06535490

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Large prospective comparative observational study in numerous reference centers in France, comparing infectious complications in patients admitted for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspiration performed with or without antibiotic prophylaxis (ATBp) according to the usual practices.

This is a prospective, comparative, observational, multicenter study, with the primary objective of comparing the infection rates in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspirated under EUS, with and without the administration of ATBp.

A sample size of 1702 patients will be needed over a 3-year study period.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

The complication rate after EUS fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) is low, around 1-3% according to various series. However, it has long been recommended to perform this procedure under antibiotic prophylaxis (ATBp). Due to the risk of developing resistance to certain classes of antibiotics and the risk of complications, particularly allergic reactions, the role of ATBp in this indication needs to be reconsidered. The latest recommendations from European and French societies do not support the systematic formal indication of ATBp for aspiration under EUS. Because the literature on the subject is sparse and equivocal, practices remain varied (some performing PCL aspirations with and others without ATBp), and scientific societies do not provide a formal stance on the benefit of such ATBp. Therefore, we decided to conduct a very large prospective comparative observational study in numerous reference centers in France (centers of the Research and Action Group in Endoscopy - GRAPHE), comparing infectious complications in patients admitted for EUS-FNA for PCL performed with or without ATBp according to the usual practices .

This is a prospective, comparative, observational, multicenter study.

Primary objective:

Comparison of infection rates after EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) , with and without the administration of ATBp.

Secondary objectives:

Rates of other infectious complications (pulmonary, urinary, etc.) Rates of post-ATBp complications, particularly allergic reactions Prolongation of scheduled hospitalization Evaluation of factors associated with post-EUS aspiration infection of PCL

After the endoscopic exploration, the patient will be monitored for the potential occurrence of complications related to EUS (perforation, hemorrhage, infection, allergy, etc.). Any adverse events will be recorded at 30 days post-procedure.

A sample size of 1702 patients will be needed over a 3-year study period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient referred for diagnostic aspiration of a pancreatic cystic lesion
  • Patient aged 18 years or older
  • Patient with ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 status
  • No participation in another concurrent clinical study

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient under 18 years old
  • Patient with ASA 4 or ASA 5 status
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with coagulation disorders preventing the performance of an EUS-FNA: PT < 50%, platelets < 50,000/mm³, current effective anticoagulation, ongoing clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor treatment
  • Patient unable to personally express non-opposition or legally protected adult

Treatment and study plan

EUS-FNA

Procedure

Puncture of pancreatic cystic lesion with a fine needle under EUS guidance

Other names: EUS fine needle aspiration

ATBp

Drug

Antibiotic prophylaxis consists of a single intravenous administration before or at the beginning of the procedure according to the common practices of each practitioner or unit

Other names: Antibiotic prophylaxis

Primary outcomes

  1. Post EUS-FNA PCL infection rate

    Time frame: 30 days

    Post-EUS-FNA infection rate of PCL (patients exhibiting clinical and biological signs - fever >38.5°C, neutrophilic leukocytosis, elevated CRP, pathogen identification in blood cultures - indicative of sepsis requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy). The occurrence of the aforementioned clinical and biological signs, along with imaging evidence (such as cyst wall thickening or presence of intracystic air images) and the absence of another infection source (urinary, pulmonary, venous, etc.) will lead to the diagnosis of post-FNA infection. Centralized validation of infection cases will be conducted by an expert panel based on clinical, biological, and imaging findings.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of urinary infectious complications

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of patients with at least one urinary infection within 21-30 days after EUS-FNA

  2. Rate of post-ATBp allergic reactions

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of patients with at least one allergic reaction within 21-30 days after EUS-FNA

  3. Duration and extension of hospitalization

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of hospitalization days per stay within 30 days following EUS-FNA

  4. Diameter of the needle used for EUS-FNA

    Time frame: 1 days

    25G, 22G, 20G, or 19G

  5. Associated procedures (confocal endomicroscopy or intracystic biopsy)

    Time frame: 1 days

    Yes or No

  6. Appearance of the fluid

    Time frame: 1 day

    Thin, thick, hemorrhagic

  7. Complete aspiration of the cyst fluid

    Time frame: 1 day

    Yes or No

  8. Nature of the PCL

    Time frame: 30 days

    mucinous vs. non-mucinous

  9. Age

    Time frame: 1 day

    Years

  10. Gender

    Time frame: 1 day

    Male or female

  11. Diabetes

    Time frame: 1 day

    Yes or No

  12. Immunosuppression

    Time frame: 1 day

    Yes or No

  13. BMI

    Time frame: 1 day

    Weight/(size)2 expressed in in kg/m^2

  14. history of aspiration of the same lesion

    Time frame: 1 day

    Yes or No

  15. Rate of pulmonary infectious complications

    Time frame: 30 days

    Number of patients with at least one pulmonary infection within 21-30 days after EUS-FNA

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

David KARSENTI, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 1 43 96 78 50

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prevention of Infection After EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A French Multicenter Prospective Comparative Observational Study

Acronym: PrePaCyst

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 2, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 2, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.