Biomedical Research Centre- Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03615040
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In contrast to other chronic diseases, COPD is increasing in prevalence and is projected to be the third-leading cause of death and disability worldwide by 2030. The costs to society for treating COPD are high, accounting for approximately 3.4% of the total health care budget of the European Union. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are responsible for a large portion of the economic burden of COPD. More than 500,000 hospitalisations and 100,000 deaths are attributed to AECOPD in the US each year. In addition to a substantial economic burden, AECOPD is also responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality from COPD.
Interleukin-33 (IL-33) is an alarmin released from the epithelium following damage. IL-33 is an IL-1 family alarmin cytokine constitutively expressed at epithelial barrier surfaces where it is rapidly released from cells during tissue injury. IL-33 signals through a receptor complex of IL-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1) (known as ST2) and IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAcP) to initiate MyD88-dependent inflammatory pathways. The role of the IL33/ST2 axis in COPD is uncertain. IL33 has been implicated in eosinophil recruitment to the airway and maturation in the bone marrow largely via its effects upon innate lymphoid cells. IL33 increased following experimental cold in asthma and thus might play a role in the consequent inflammatory response and possible susceptibility to secondary bacterial infection in obstructive lung disease. Both eosinophilic inflammation and viral infection drive COPD exacerbations and therefore targeting the IL33/ST2 axis might reduce COPD exacerbations.
The main aim of this trial is to evaluate whether anti-ST2 will impact on airway inflammation in COPD and therefore reduce the frequency of exacerbations. For the purposes of this trial, exacerbations are defined as flare-ups of symptoms involving the use of healthcare resulting in treatment with steroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalisation or death due to COPD.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
This is a single-centre, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel group, randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-ST2 compared to placebo, in patients with moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD II-IV). Anti-ST2 will be administered via subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks (Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44) during the 48-week treatment period. Participants will be followed up for 60 weeks (i.e. 48 week treatment period and 12 week follow-up), with secondary outcome measures at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 weeks and at exacerbation events presenting prior to treatment initiation.
After signing the informed consent at the initial visit, patients will enter a screening period which should last for up to 2 weeks unless extension of the screening period is necessary under certain circumstances. Patients who qualify to participate in the study will be randomised into a 48-week treatment period in which they will receive either 490 mg anti-ST2 or a matching placebo. Patients will be evaluated for an additional 12 weeks following completion of the randomised treatment period. Treatment groups will remain blinded until the 60-week follow-up period is completed, and trial database is locked.
This trial is sponsored by the University of Leicester, coordinated by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) - Respiratory and Leicester Clinical Trials Unit (LCTU) and funded by Genentech, Inc.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of anti-ST2 versus placebo on frequency of moderate-to-severe exacerbations (health care utilisation resulting in treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics or hospitalisation, respectively) as add-on to standard of care.
Secondary objectives: another key objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) doses of anti-ST2 compared to placebo in adult patients with moderate to very severe COPD.
Additionally, to assess the effects of anti-ST2 versus placebo both during stable visits and at the exacerbation events on the following:
Exploratory objectives include:
Subgroup objectives: to evaluate the efficacy of anti-ST2 versus placebo on the outcome rate of protocol-defined COPD exacerbations through 48 weeks treatment period, patient reported outcomes (PROs) [SGRQ-c], and lung function [FEV1] in subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophil count.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MSTT1041A (RO7187807; formerly made by Amgen [AMG] and referred to as AMG 282) is a novel biopharmaceutical that blocks signaling of interleukin (IL)-33, an inflammatory cytokine of the IL-1 family and member of the newly discovered "alarmin" class of molecules. IL-33 is released from airway epithelial cells in response to allergens, irritants, and infection. IL-33 release can trigger acute exacerbations in both asthma and COPD. MSTT1041A has the ability to block inflammation,prevent exacerbations, and improve lung function and quality of life.
Anti-ST2 is presented as sterile, clear, and colourless to slightly yellow liquid. Each sterile vial is filled with a 1 mL deliverable volume of 70 mg/mL. It is formulated with 15 mM sodium acetate, 9.0% (w/v) sucrose, 0.01% (w/v) polysorbate 20, pH 5.2.
Other names: RO7187807, ST2 MAb, Anti-ST2, AMG 282, RG6149
Placebo for Anti-ST2 (MSTT1041A) is formulated with 10 mM sodium acetate, 9.0% (w/v) sucrose, 0.004% (w/v) polysorbate 20, pH 5.2, and is supplied in an identical vial configuration.
Time frame: 0-48 weeks
Where a COPD exacerbation is defined by symptomatic worsening of COPD requiring:
Time frame: Weeks 0 , 4, 12, 24, 26, 48
Number of Participants with Adverse Events in the 48 Weeks of the Trial From First Dose
Time frame: Weeks 0 , 4, 12, 24, 26, 48
Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events in the 48 Weeks of the Trial From First Dose
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Patient reported outcome (PRO). To evaluate health status; designed to measure health impairment in patients with asthma and COPD. It is in two parts. Part I produces the Symptoms score, and Part 2 the Activity and Impact scores. A Total score is also produced. The Total score is calculated by summing the weights to all the positive responses in each component. This score is then put onto the scale 0 to 100 by dividing by the Total possible sum (3201.9)- and times by 100. A score of 0 would represent the best health and a score of 100 would represent the worst possible state of the patient.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Patient reported outcome (PRO). To evaluate health status: evaluation and rehabilitation education guidance on the respiratory and motor functions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CAT score is made by summing the score to eight questions on COPD. For each, the person with COPD picks the number between 0-5 that reflects their response. A zero indicates no effect on quality of life, whereas a 5 suggests a very significant effect.The CAT has a scoring range of 0-40, with 40 indicating the most severe COPD and 0 being the least severe COPD.
A change of 2 units suggests a meaningful difference. This test should be used in conjunction with the mMRC and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to determine COPD health assessment of participants.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Patient reported outcome (PRO). To evaluate respiratory breathlessness symptoms (Grade 0-4, with Grade 0 being breathlessness with strenuous exercise to Grade 4 being breathlessness for daily activities like dressing).
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Patient reported outcome (PRO). To evaluate respiratory symptoms. The participant is asked to place a mark (X) on the scale at the point that best describes their health currently. Minimum score 0mm (better outcome), maximum score 100mm (worse outcome) for each section of the scale (dyspnoea, cough, sputum). The Total VAS score is the sum of the 3 scales, thus the minimum score is 0 (best outcome) and the maximum 300 (worst outcome).
Time frame: Screening, week 12, 28, 36, 48
The sputum purulence colour card using the Bronko test has values of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Lower scores indicate better health.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 48
To assess lung function. The participant will take a maximum inhalation, release maximum exhalation and then continue to exhale afterwards. They will then be treated with a bronchodilator. The spirometry test is then repeated to determine how much the bronchodilator medication helped with breathing. FEV1/FVC ratio will be calculated.
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess lung function. FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in first 1 second, after full inspiration. Post BD Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Time frame: Week 0 and week 48
To assess lung function, i.e. the functional residual capacity of the lungs. The participant sits inside an airtight box, inhales or exhales to a particular volume (usually FRC), and then a shutter drops across their breathing tube. The participant makes respiratory efforts against the closed shutter, causing their chest volume to expand and decompressing the air in their lungs. The increase in their chest volume slightly reduces the box volume (the non-person volume of the box) and thus slightly increases the pressure in the box. Total Lung Capacity and Residual Volume measured.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess inflammation at exacerbation events. White blood cells, eosinophils and neutrophils will be measured.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess inflammation at exacerbation events. Eosinophils cells will be measured.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 48
To assess lung function. The participant will take a maximum inhalation, release maximum exhalation and then continue to exhale afterwards. They will then be treated with a bronchodilator. The spirometry test is then repeated to determine how much the bronchodilator medication helped with breathing. FEV1 and FVC will be measured.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 48
To assess lung function. The participant will take a maximum inhalation, release maximum exhalation and then continue to exhale afterwards. They will then be treated with a bronchodilator. The spirometry test is then repeated to determine how much the bronchodilator medication helped with breathing. FEV1 % predicted and FVC % predicted will be measured.
Time frame: Week 0 and week 48
To assess lung function, i.e. the functional residual capacity of the lungs. The participant sits inside an airtight box, inhales or exhales to a particular volume (usually FRC), and then a shutter drops across their breathing tube. The participant makes respiratory efforts against the closed shutter, causing their chest volume to expand and decompressing the air in their lungs. The increase in their chest volume slightly reduces the box volume (the non-person volume of the box) and thus slightly increases the pressure in the box. Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity ratio will be calculated. RV/TLC ratio: this is the residual volume (RV) to total lung capacity (TLC). It is calculated as a percentage as follows: RV/TLC ×100.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess inflammation at exacerbation events. Sputum inflammatory cell differentials: Macrophages
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess inflammation at exacerbation events. Epithelium cells will be measured.
Time frame: Screening and week 48
Quantitative measures of airway geometry and densitometry. Mean lung density expiratory/inspiratory [MLD E/I] (small airway), % wall area [WA] and LA (larger airways) will be measured.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Various biomarkers of inflammation will be measured in sputum.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Various biomarkers of inflammation will be measured in blood.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
ILC2 cells will be analysed using plasma for biomarkers.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Various biomarkers of inflammation will be measured in urine.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
Mediators of inflammation in blood, sputum and urine will be assessed.
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess upper airway inflammation. This is a non-invasive method to sample nasal mucosal lining fluid using a synthetic absorptive matrix (SAM) of low protein binding. The SAM is advanced up the lumen of the nasal cavity, and then the outside of the nose is gently pressed to oppose the SAM against the nasal mucosa for 30 seconds.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess airway upper inflammation. Nasal epithelial cells will be sampled from the anterior nares using either a polyester swab or a cytology brush with the standard collection method - cytology brush sampling from beneath the inferior turbinate. This test is optional for participants.
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess inflammation. PTR-MS, ADVION and ReCIVA will be used to measure gaseous molecules found in the breath that are from inside and outside the lungs. We aim to collect these molecule and analyse them to see if there are any changes in a persons breath that could be linked to the metabolic health, before, during and after taking the drug or placebo.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess airway infection and ecology. We will analyse the microbes in patients' lungs using their sputum samples and profile the effect of treatment on these microbes.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To assess airway infection and ecology. We will analyse the microbes in patients' lungs and profile the effect of treatment on these microbes.
Time frame: Baseline and week 48
To evaluate the rate of protocol-defined COPD exacerbations through 48 weeks treatment period, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and lung functions, by subgroup outcomes.
Time frame: Screening, weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To evaluate the efficacy of anti-ST2 versus placebo on the outcome rate of protocol-defined COPD exacerbations through 48 weeks treatment period, patient reported outcomes (PROs) and lung function in subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophil count.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48
To evaluate the efficacy of anti-ST2 versus placebo on the outcome rate of protocol-defined COPD exacerbations through 48 weeks treatment period, patient reported outcomes (PROs) and lung function in subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophil count.
Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48
To evaluate the efficacy of anti-ST2 versus placebo on the outcome rate of protocol-defined COPD exacerbations through 48 weeks treatment period, patient reported outcomes (PROs) and lung function in subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophil count.
University of Leicester
Other
A Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial of Anti-ST2 in COPD (COPD-ST2OP)
Acronym: COPD-ST2OP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04320342
COPD, COPD Exacerbation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04481555
Azithromycin, COPD
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05492149
COPD, COPD Exacerbation
Montivilliers, Groupe Hospitalier Du Havre, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07185581
COPD, COPD Exacerbation
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details