Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06641375
Background and Rationale:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. In that small fraction of patients who are eligible for surgery, more than 70% resume taking a medicine for their reflux disease. GERD is common among the US veterans and currently there is a lack of minimally invasive endoscopic therapies for management of GERD. This study will investigate performance of minimally invasive, endoscopic therapy using antireflux mucosal ablation (hybrid argon plasma coagulation) that has been used in other areas of GI tract with efficacy and safety for management of chronic GERD among the US veterans.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of antireflux mucosal ablation or ARAT (intervention group) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (typical symptoms of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for the last 6 months and objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study off PPI for 5-7 days) compared to sham procedure (control group).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India
Location status: Recruiting
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: Inclusion:
Exclusion:
Study groups:
Patients recruited will be randomized to undergo antireflux mucosal ablation (ARAT) OR sham intervention after inclusion and exclusion criteria have been met.
Study procedure:
Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by computer generated random sequence of numbers.
The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:
Screening Visit(s) A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for an upper endoscopy.
Randomization (Intervention) visit: Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo either the study intervention OR sham intervention.
24-48 hour and 7-10 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
25-30 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
3-4 Month (80-112 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
6-7 month (165-196 days post randomization) visit phone call to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
11-12 month (336-365 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
Secondary aims:
erosive esophagitis, and placement of pH capsule. During the 3 month, 6 month and 12 months visit, use of PPI therapy (dose and frequency) will be recorded. Response to therapy will be assessed using the following parameters: improvement of GERD-HRQL scores, reduction in RDQ scores, AET <4% and DeMeester score <14 (off PPI). Any patients with dysphagia after the ARAT will undergo repeat endoscopy for evaluation. If significant stricture, endoscopic dilation will be performed per severity of symptoms and stenosis.
Duration of this study from subject randomization to completion is 1 year, however, we anticipate study duration of at least 24 months for subject screening, completion of study visits and data analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
o the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20
The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated.
Patients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks.
Time frame: 1 year
To determine if procedure can decrease Gastroesophageal reflux scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 365 days
To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
Time frame: 1 year
To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention
Time frame: 1 year
To determine if intervention can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
Time frame: 1 year
To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT therapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rajesh Goud Dr Maragoni, Bpharm, Mpharm, MBA, PGDM
CONTACT
04023378888 ext. 224
Rakesh Dr Kalapala, MBBS MD DNB
CONTACT
04023378888 ext. 112
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Other
Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients
Acronym: AREA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07227506
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03886961
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05469854
Cardiodynamic ECG, Deglutition Disorders
Uppsala, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06241183
Acid Reflux, Deglutition Disorders
Stony Brook, New York, United States
View Trial Details