Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01084889

Anterior Pelvic Prolapse Reconstruction With TiLOOP® Total 6

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of Anterior Pelvic Prolapse Reconstruction with a titanised polypropylene mesh on rate of erosion and patients quality of live.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Berliner Kontinenzzentrum am Franziskus Krankenhaus,, Berlin, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multicentre, non-randomised, observational clinical device investigation will be performed to obtain post-marketing information on the TiLOOP® pelvic floor reconstruction meshes and in particular on the rate of rare erosions of the device under investigation as well as on the improvement of patients' quality of life. It is expected that the rate of erosions is equal or lower compared to competitor devices currently on the market. To verify this, it will be shown that within the first year the erosion rate found for the product under investigation is in the range of 7.9 ± 5.4 %, which is the mean erosion rate found in the recent literature. Erosion, in the sense of the hypothesis, is any erosion 1 requiring more than simply the cut off of a single short filament.

It is also expected that the patient's quality of life is meliorated after implantation of a TiLOOP® Total 6 mesh. To verify this, it will be shown that by means of a validated questionnaire the subjective quality of life after 6 months is significantly better than before implantation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with a symptomatic genital descensus : at least stage II (ICS-classification according POP-Q system), or stage I with a symptomatic requiring intervention. This applies to primary as well as recurrent intervention
  • Existence of a cystocele.
  • Patient is mentally able to understand the nature, aims, or possible consequences of the clinical investigation
  • Patient information has been handed out and all written consents are at hand.
  • Patient has attained full age.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or unfinished family planning.
  • Known intolerance to the mesh-implants under investigation.
  • Patients with acute (last 12 months) carcinoma.
  • Patients with history of radiotherapy in the pelvic area.
  • Genital descensus without any complaints.
  • Patients with implanted pelvic floor mesh.
  • Systemic steroid treatment.
  • Lack of written patients' informed consent.
  • Lack of patient compliance regarding data collection, treatment or follow-up investigations in the scope of the protocol.
  • Patient is institutionalised by court or official order (MPG §20.3).
  • Participation in another clinical investigation.

Treatment and study plan

surgical mesh implantation (TiLOOP® Total 6)

Device

The standard procedure for the surgical repair of anterior prolapse is via the obturator membrane. The surgical mesh TiLOOP® Total 6 is placed transvaginal by the aid of TiLOOP® surgical instruments to place the mesh arms.

Other names: TiLOOP® Total 6

Primary outcomes

  1. Erosion rate

    Time frame: 12 months

    Erosion, in the sense of the end point, is any erosion requiring more than simply the cut off of a single short filament.

  2. Patient's quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months

    It will be shown that by means of a validated questionnaire whether the subjective quality of life after 6 months is significantly better than before implantation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Time frame: at 6, 12, 36 months

    Documentation and independent evaluation of all complications.

  2. Feasibility of the mesh implantation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluation of questions on usability.

  3. Erosion rate

    Time frame: 36 months

    Erosion, in the sense of the end point, is any erosion requiring more than simply the cut off of a single short filament.

  4. Patient's quality of life

    Time frame: 12 and 36 months

    It will be shown that by means of a validated questionnaire whether the subjective quality of life after 6 months is significantly better than before implantation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

pfm medical gmbh

Industry

Collaborators

  • Aix Scientifics
  • Bayes GmbH
  • Crolll Gmbh
  • GfE Medizintechnik GmbH
  • pfm medical titanium gmbh

Registry information

Official study title

National, Multicentre Post-marketing Surveillance Study on Anterior Pelvic Prolapse Reconstruction With Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Total 6)

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2016
First posted
Mar 11, 2010
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.