annual noncontrast MRI
Deviceliver MRI without contrast agents T2 weighted image, T1 in/out of phase, diffusion weighted images with b-values of 0, 500 mm2/s
NCT Number: NCT02551250
The investigators will investigate the usefulness of biannual ultrasonography versus annual non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in single arm patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–99 year
All sexes
Observational
Korean University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major complications in patients with chronic liver disease. The prognosis of HCC relies on the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis. Hence to detect cancer at an earlier stage, a regular surveillance test is important for the subjects with a high risk of developing cancer. Current guidelines recommend a regular surveillance using ultrasonography (US) at a 6 month-interval. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive and safe procedure, yet it is limited by the skills of the operator and it is often difficult to differentiate cancer from regenerating nodules especially in atrophied cirrhotic liver. According to a recent meta-analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity of detecting liver cancer using ultrasonography were both over 90%, however the sensitivity was decreased to 60% in detecting early lesions in which surgery or liver transplantation is indicated. Of note, addition of alpha feto protein(AFP) to ultrasonography also failed to increase the sensitivity in detecting small cancers. Taken together, there is a need to develop a new surveillance test with an improved sensitivity and specificity.
Recently, a retrospective study reported that CT or MRI showed a better sensitivity than ultrasonography in detecting early liver cancer. However, performing CT as a surveillance test is limited by frequent exposure to radiation and contrast-dye agent. Although MRI does not have the risk of radiation-exposure, it is limited by the high cost and limited availability. On the contrast, non-contrast MRI offers a cost that is comparable to US and an absence of exposure to radiation or contrast-dye agent, which suggests non-contrast MRI as a good alternative surveillance tool for early detection of HCC. Therefore, in this prospective trial, the investigators will investigate the usefulness of biannual ultrasonography versus annual non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A. The evidence of cirrhosis of any etiology within 12 months prior to screening Definition of cirrhosis by any of following methods
B. Risk Index larger than 2.33; Risk Index = 1.65 (if the prothrombin activity is <=75%) + 1.41 (if the age is 50 years or older) + 0.92 (if the platelet count is <=100,000/mm3) + 0.74 (if the presence of HCV is positive).
Exclusion criteria
liver MRI without contrast agents T2 weighted image, T1 in/out of phase, diffusion weighted images with b-values of 0, 500 mm2/s
liver ultrasonography for HCC screening performed by experienced sonologists
Time frame: 3 years
sensitivity for detecting HCC
Time frame: years
survival of the patients who developed HCC on follow-up period
Time frame: 3 years
false referral rate for HCC
JOON-IL CHOI
Other
Comparison of Biannual Ultrasonography and Annual Unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Surveillance Test for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis
Acronym: MAGNUS-HCC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01082419
Adenocarcinoma, Biliary Cholestasis
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07193316
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02695628
Adenocarcinoma, Adult Liver Carcinoma
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01943318
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details