Institut de Cardiologie - Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75013, France
NCT Number: NCT00442949
Release of troponin evaluated by the peak of troponin during the hospital phase.Because of its sensitivity and specificity as well as its widespread use in routine practice, rise in troponin levels is the main assessment criteria of this study. We plan to demonstrate a significantly altered distribution of the troponin release as evaluated by the peak of troponin for each patient during the hospitalization period (from randomization to cardiologic unit discharge), in the two arms of the trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Paris, 75013, France
We propose to evaluate the optimal moment for catheterization in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes by comparing rapid catheterization on the day of admission (within 8 hours of admission, with an average time close to 3 hours, as in the rapid strategy arm of the ISAR-COOL trial) with a slower approach where the examination is scheduled for the next working day (8 to 60 hours post admission, with an average close to 24 hours). Patients included will present with severe unstable angina defined as a TIMI score > 3 All patients must present with an indication for catheterization and they will receive the same optimal pharmacological treatment including abciximab (ReoPro*) when undergoing PCI and started just before the procedure as indicated in the label of the drug (substitution by another drug of the class, eptifibatide or tirofiban, is not possible in the catheterization laboratory according to the labels of these two other drugs). Randomization will evaluate only time to catheterization: rapidly, as soon as possible following admission (within 8 hours of admission) versus a delayed approach (8 to 60 hours following admission). The goal of randomization is to determine the ideal time to catheterization while indications for catheterization, pharmacological treatment, and patient care remain constant. This is a pragmatic study aiming to compare 2 different strategies in the management of ACS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
ACS is defined by at least two of the following diagnostic criteria :
Severity of ACS is defined by a TIMI score > 3
Exclusion criteria
Catheterization immediate PCI
delayed PCI
Time frame: during the hospital phase
Time frame: during 1month following randomization
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Angioplasty to Blunt the Rise of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized for an Immediate or Delayed Intervention (The ABOARD Study)
Acronym: ABOARD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05853042
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05992259
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Krasnodar, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06440278
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05183178
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details