The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510317, China
NCT Number: NCT02069262
There were many approaches for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Capsule endoscopy (CE), double-balloon endoscopy, deep small-bowel spiral enteroscopy, laparoscopy, computed tomography and angiography have been recommended as investigation. However, of these techniques, the evaluation and management of patients with OGIB remains a formidable challenge. We compared the diagnostic yield and long-term outcomes of patients with OGIB randomized to angiogram combination laparoscopy or angiogram alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510317, China
Consecutive patients who presented with OGIB to the second people's hospital of GuangDong province between January 2003 and November 2008 were recruited. This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Second people's Hospital of GuangDong Province and was designed according to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines. All patients gave written informed consent before beginning the study. As a standard protocol, all patients presented with melena or hematochezia would receive at least 2 times upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before admission. Patients who had nondiagnostic upper GI endoscopy were also offered at least 2 times colonoscopy before admission. All gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed by experienced endoscopists (hanning Wang). OGIB were defined as patients who had nondiagnostic upper endoscopy and colonoscopy.
Patients who were < 18 years, pregnant, in moribund conditions, or with terminal malignancy were excluded. Patients with contrast allergy and impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 150 µmol/l) were also not eligible for this study. All patients were randomized to receive either mesenteric angiography alone or angiography combination laparoscopy in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was performed computer-generated list using a randomly permuted block design. To ensure concealed randomization, the randomization code was put in opaque envelope and kept by researchers not performing angiography or angiography combination laparoscopy. Both patients and investigators were unaware of the randomization sequence.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Those who developed rebleeding during the observation would be crossed over to the other investigation modality.
Other names: angiography, laparoscopy
Time frame: 5 years after initial examination
The primary outcome of this study was the diagnostic yield of angiography combination laparoscopy and mesenteric angiography alone in identifying the source of bleeding.
Time frame: follow-up to 5 years
Secondary outcome measures included long-term rebleeding rates, further hospital admissions for bleeding or anemia, further blood transfusion, and death.
The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06634030
Surgical Wound, Wound Healing
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07601919
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT03452072
Surgical Wound, Wound Heal
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06073678
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details