St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04730310
The role of regional anesthesia in lower extremity revascularization procedures on reducing graft failure and need for reoperation remains unclear. In this study, we will analyze data from the multicenter National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) to assess the association between regional anesthesia (RA) and graft outcomes, as compared to general anesthesia (GA). Our primary objective is to determine for patients undergoing elective open lower limb revascularization, whether RA (spinal, epidural, and peripheral nerve block), compared to GA or general anesthesia with regional anesthesia (GA+RA), is associated with higher rates of patent graft within 30 days postoperatively (primary outcome).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–110 year
All sexes
Observational
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Lower limb (infrainguinal) revascularization surgeries are performed for patients with blood flow occlusion, with the goals of improving pain and function. Graft patency is associated with higher quality of life scores. However, open lower limb revascularization is associated with a significant risk of graft failure. Multiple anesthesia options exist for elective open lower limb revascularization, including general and regional (spinal, epidural, peripheral nerve block). The literature has shown mixed results regarding the superiority of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia for morbidity and mortality. In this study, we will analyze data from the multicenter National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) to assess the association between regional anesthesia (RA) and graft outcomes, as compared to general anesthesia (GA).Our primary objective is to determine for patients undergoing elective open lower limb revascularization, whether RA (spinal, epidural, and peripheral nerve block), compared to GA or general anesthesia with regional anesthesia (GA+RA), is associated with higher rates of patent graft within 30 days postoperatively (primary outcome). Our secondary outcomes are major reintervention, amputation, bleeding requiring transfusion or secondary procedure, venous thromboembolism (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, pneumonia, discharge destination, postoperative length of stay, readmission rate, and death, all within 30 days postoperatively. There will be two composite outcomes: thromboembolism, and morbidity and mortality. We hypothesize that the use of RA is associated with increased graft patency after elective lower limb revascularization compared to GA. Compared to GA, RA is associated with decreased rates of major reintervention, amputation, death (30 days), bleeding requiring transfusion or secondary procedure, VTE, MI or stroke, pneumonia, mortality, composite thromboembolism, and composite morbidity and mortality.; Compared to GA, RA is associated with increased rates of discharge destination being home.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Infrainguinal, open lower extremity revascularization procedures
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
dichotomize as home vs. not home
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 30 days or in-hospital admission
Time frame: 30 days
combination of venothromboembolism, MI, stroke
Time frame: 30 days
combination of bleeding requiring transfusion, venothromboembolism, MI, stroke, pneumonia, death
Time frame: day of surgery
age, bleeding diathesis, severe COPD, total operating, time, renal failure, functional status, cardiac valvular disease, diabetes
Time frame: day of surgery
INR, PTT
University of British Columbia
Other
Association of Anesthesia Technique With Graft Patency Rates After Open Lower Limb Revascularization: a Retrospective Population Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.