Daprodustat
DrugDaprodustat will be supplied as film coated tablets for oral administration containing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 mg of daprodustat. Doses of 12, 16, and 24 mg of daprodustat will be provided using multiples of these tablet strengths.
NCT Number: NCT03029208
The purpose of this multi-center study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat in subjects with anemia associated with CKD.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Ciudad Evita, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Daprodustat will be supplied as film coated tablets for oral administration containing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 mg of daprodustat. Doses of 12, 16, and 24 mg of daprodustat will be provided using multiples of these tablet strengths.
Darbepoetin alfa will be supplied as prefilled syringes (PFS) for SC/IV injection available in strengths: 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 150 mcg.
Iron therapy will be administered if ferritin is <=100 ng/mL and/or TSAT is <=20%.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Blood samples were collected from participants for Hgb measurement. Hgb during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization Hgb values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis missing post-Baseline Hgb values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Change from Baseline was defined as the average of post-randomization values during the evaluation period minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including randomization stratification factors Baseline Hgb and treatment was performed to obtain a point estimate and two-sided 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference (daprodustat-darbepoetin alfa).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 52
Total IV iron dose per participant was calculated from Day 1 to the earliest of (Week 52 visit date, first blood [red blood cells or whole blood] transfusion date and treatment stop date plus [+] 1 day) which corresponds to the time while the participant was on randomized treatment and before receiving a blood transfusion. Average monthly IV iron dose was calculated by Total IV iron dose divided by (/) (the number of days from Day 1 to the earliest of [Week 52 visit date, first blood transfusion date and treatment stop date +1] /30.4375 days). Data for participants until they underwent a red blood cells or whole blood transfusion was included in the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
SBP, DBP and MAP were measured in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minutes of rest. MAP is an average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. This analysis was carried out by using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of treatment (last on-treatment value until Week 52)
SBP, DBP and MAP were measured in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minutes of rest. MAP is an average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. End of treatment value for the blood pressure parameters were defined as the latest value on or before the last non-zero dose date plus (+) 1 day. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. This analysis was carried out by using ANCOVA model.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
BP exacerbation event is defined (based on post-dialysis BP) as SBP >=25 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) increased from Baseline or SBP >=180 mmHg; or DBP >=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP >=110 mmHg. The BP exacerbation events per 100 participant years was estimated using the Negative Binomial Model.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
BP exacerbation was defined (based on post-dialysis BP) as: SBP >=25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP >=180 mmHg; DBP >=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP >=110 mmHg. Number of participants with at least one blood pressure exacerbation event is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected from participants for Hgb measurements. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52
Mean Hgb during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable Hgb values during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52) including any evaluable unscheduled Hgb values that were taken during this time period. Hgb responders were defined as number of participants with a mean Hgb during the evaluation period that falls within the Hgb analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL.
Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time for which Hgb was within range for a participant was calculated by dividing 'the total number of days that Hgb was within range during Weeks 28 to 52' by 'the total number of days the participant remained on treatment during Weeks 28 to 52'.
Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time for which Hgb was within range for a participant was calculated by dividing 'the total number of days that Hgb was within range during Weeks 28 to 52' by 'the total number of days the participant remained on treatment during Weeks 28 to 52'.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of participants permanently stopping randomized treatment due to meeting rescue criteria has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). The PCS is an average score derived from 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) representing overall physical health. PCS ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). MCS is an average score derived from 4 domains (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) representing overall mental health. MCS ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: bodily pain, general health, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, physical functioning and vitality. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 28 and 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Vitality ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 28 and 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Physical functioning ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus (-) Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 concepts-EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire, consisting of 5items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale(no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state(e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health), higher the score better the health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value-Baseline value. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 concepts -EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessment questionnaire, consisting of five items covering five dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by a five-point Likert scale (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The range for the EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 with '0' is worst health and '1' is full health. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical VAS, ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health one can imagine and 100 represents the best health one can imagine. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
CKD-AQ is 21-item patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and symptom impact in participants with anemia associated with CKD. It had 3 domains: 1.Tired/Low Energy/Weak scale consisting of 10 items; 2.Chest Pain/Shortness of Breath scale consisting of 4 items; and 3.Cognitive scale consisting of 3 items. The 4 CKD-AQ single items are: (shortness of breath, no activity), (severity-short breath, resting), (difficulty standing for long time) and (difficulty sleeping). Single-item were recorded based on a 0-100 scoring with 0=worst possible and 100=best possible score. Three domains scores were calculated as average of items in each domain and ranged from 0-100 where 0=worst possible and 100=best possible score. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity on a 5-point disease severity scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, or 4=very severe). A higher score indicated worse outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose; each pharmacokinetic sample was taken at Week 4 or 8 or 12
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose on Week 4 or 8 or 12 for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2506104 (M3), and GSK2531401 (M13). GSK2391220, GSK2506104 and GSK2531401 are the metabolites of Daprodustat (GSK1278863). Protocol allowed participants to provide pharmacokinetic samples on Week 4 or 8 or 12. Pharmacokinetic Population comprised of participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained and analyzed.
Time frame: Pre-Dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose; each pharmacokinetic sample was taken at Week 4 or 8 or 12
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose on Week 4 or 8 or 12 for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2506104 (M3), and GSK2531401 (M13). GSK2391220, GSK2506104 and GSK2531401 are the metabolites of Daprodustat (GSK1278863). Protocol allowed participants to provide pharmacokinetic samples on Week 4 or 8 or 12.
Time frame: Pre-Dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose; each pharmacokinetic sample was taken at Week 4 or 8 or 12
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post-dose on Week 4 or 8 or 12 for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2506104 (M3), and GSK2531401 (M13). GSK2391220, GSK2506104 and GSK2531401 are the metabolites of Daprodustat (GSK1278863). Protocol allowed participants to provide pharmacokinetic samples on Week 4 or 8 or 12.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A 52-week Open-label (Sponsor-blind), Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daprodustat Compared to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Subjects With Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are Initiating Dialysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01121237
Anaemia, Anemia
Bregenz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05682326
Anaemia, Anemia
Aichi, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03409107
Anaemia, Anemia
Homewood, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02876835
Anaemia, Anemia
Andalusia, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details