University Hospital of Patras
Pátrai, Achaia, 26504, Greece
NCT Number: NCT03986151
This randomized, single-center, prospective study seeks to compare the conventional radial approach with the recently described distal radial approach (anatomical snuffbox) concerning the patency of the radial artery in patients subjected to coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pátrai, Achaia, 26504, Greece
Transradial approach has become the standard approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current ESC/EACTS guidelines of myocardial revascularization support using radial approach (RA) rather than femoral approach (FA) if the operators are experts for RA. Recently, an alternative transradial access has been suggested at the anatomical snuffbox, with potential additional benefits including a reduction in radial artery occlusion rate (which allows reintervention through the same access site and potential use as a graft), a decrease in other local vascular complications, shorter hemostasis duration, patients' intra and post procedural comfort and shorter recovery time. However, the feasibility of PCI via snuffbox approach is still concerned due to the lack of data. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare the two approaches concerning the patency of the radial artery ≥30 days after the intervention with Doppler in a randomized way. Due to the anastomosis of the distal radial artery with the superficial palmar arch, even in case of total radial artery occlusion within the anatomical snuffbox, the antegrade blood flow may be preserved and, therefore, decreased incidents of radial artery occlusion are expected in the right distal radial artery approach group. The mean diameter of radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox is 2.4 mm, whereas the mean diameter of the radial artery at the forearm is 2.7 mm, and this could potentially contribute to shorter hemostasis duration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of the conventional radial approach with the distal radial approach (anatomical snuffbox)
Time frame: ≥30 days after CAG or PCI
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: Immediately post-procedurally
Time frame: 1-6 hours
Time frame: 3 hours
Time frame: ≥30 days after CAG or PCI
Time frame: 1 hour
Pain scale 0-10. A visual anlog pain scale 0-10 will be shown to the patient post-precedurally. 0=no pain, 10=worst pain. Patient will be asked to report the severity of the pain associated with the procedure.
University Hospital of Patras
Other
Acronym: ANGIE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03253692
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04624854
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06787287
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04298307
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details