Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05529459

Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With DES Eluting in Patients With CAD

This study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography-guided anatomic complete revascularization and fractional flow reserve-guided physiologic complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a prospective, multicenter center, open-label, randomized trial to compare QCA-guided versus FFR-guided CR strategies in patients with significant CAD who are undergoing PCI with DES. Patients with symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia are eligible for enrollment if there have stenotic lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50%-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation, and CR is expected to be achievable by PCI. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in the session 4. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either QCA-guided CR or FFR-guided CR group. In the QCA-guided CR group, PCI will be performed if there are lesions with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by QCA during the index procedure (and, if necessary, planned staged procedure). In the FFR-guided CR group, FFR is measured for the target coronary lesions, and then PCI will be performed for the lesions with FFR ≤0.80. Post-PCI FFR measurement is strongly recommended. However, additional procedures are not recommended based on post-PCI FFR value because there is no consensus of the optimal cut-off value to define physiologic CR. In both QCA-guided and FFR-guided PCI groups, imaging guidance during PCI is left at the discretion of the operator. However, routine high pressure post-dilation with noncompliant balloons is recommended to achieve optimal stent expansion with minimal residual stenosis (diameter stenosis < 10% on visual estimation). Patients will be followed clinically at 1, 6, 12 months, and then upto 5 years after the index procedure

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women between the ages of 19and older
  • Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI Significant lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation.
  • The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

  • Coronary lesions resulting in the expected inability to perform FFR (ex, severe tortuosity or extreme angulation of the vessels)
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Failed PCI of severe stenotic (diameter stenosis > 90%) or ACS culprit lesions
  • Previous PCI within 6 months before the index procedure
  • Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
  • Left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%)
  • Life expectancy < 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes
  • Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure
  • A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer
  • Patient's pregnant or breast-feeding or child-bearing potential.
  • A known intolerance to antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor)
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to DES material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  • Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Procedure

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with death

    Time frame: 12month

    Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death

  2. Number of Participants with MI

    Time frame: 12month

    Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.

  3. Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization

    Time frame: 12month

    Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with death

    Time frame: 5years

    Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death

  2. Number of Participants with MI

    Time frame: 5years

    Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.

  3. Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization

    Time frame: 5years

    Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.

  4. Number of Participants with bleeding

    Time frame: 5years

    Major or minor bleeding according to definitions from TIMI

  5. Number of Participants with rehospitalization

    Time frame: 5years

    Rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome or repeat PCI

  6. Self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale by EQ5D

    Time frame: 5years

    EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group and provides a simple and general questionnaire for use in clinical assessments

  7. cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 5years

    Procedure-related cost during index procedure

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jiwon Baek, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

82230107267

Seung-Whan Lee, Investigator

CONTACT

[email protected]

82230103170

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.

Other

Collaborators

  • Biotronik Korea Co., Ltd

Registry information

Official study title

ASSIST Trial Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With Drug Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Acronym: ASSIST

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
Sep 7, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.