University Hospital
Grenoble, 38000, France
NCT Number: NCT01848964
This study aims at evaluating the relation between quality of the interface between the stump and the prosthesis, and the quality of gait in above-knee amputees.
The hypothesis is that an adapted prosthesis allowing an efficient gait in above-knee amputees corresponds to an homogeneous pressure distribution pattern onto the stump.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Grenoble, 38000, France
Forty amputee patients will be evaluated for satisfaction with the prosthesis, pressure repartition pattern and functional capabilities.
Pressure at the stump-socket interface will be recorded using a set of 14 single cells sensors placed in predefined positions onto the stump. Pattern of pressure will be measured in four tasks: sitting posture, standing posture, gait initiation, and gait at preferred velocity.
Reproducibility of the pressure repartition pattern will be analyzed by repeating gait and standing posture task in the first 15 patients included.
In patients whom prosthesis has been modified on the basis on the first pressure measurement (pressure peak and bad functional capacities), a new pressure measurement will be repeated 2-8 weeks apart.
Postural and gait abilities will be also assessed in 40 age/gender matched non-amputated subjects to serve as control data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinical examination will include stump pain, wound, scar and unusual shape.
Questionnaire will include satisfaction scale (SatPro), comfort scale (SCE), and functional scale (PPA-LCI)
After installing the sensors on the stump, the patient will put his prosthesis on and will perform the following tasks: gait, sitting and standing posture and gait initiation.
Pressure repartition at the stump-socket interface will be assessed with the 14 flat sensors.
Gait parameters will be assessed with the OptoGait device. Standing posture and gait initiation parameters will be assessed with a force-plate.
Time frame: At inclusion (baseline) for all patients
Maximal distance(m)walked during 2 minutes (one trial)
Time frame: At inclusion (Baseline) for all patients
Calculated on the basis of 10 walking trials of 10 meters. The maximal pressure will be measured at each step for each sensor. The mean maximal pressure is calculated for each of the 14 sensors. The variation coefficient is calculated between these 14 values (variation coefficient = standard deviation/mean)
A low variation coefficient of pressure is supposed to represent an homogeneous repartition of the pressure in the prosthesis.
Time frame: Five weeks (W5) in average after inclusion in patients in whom the prosthesis will be modified
If a modification of the prosthesis is required and performed on the basis of the first assessment (at inclusion), a new assessment with the modified prosthesis is performed 5 weeks later (from 2 to 8 weeks).
Change in walking capabilities is assessed by calculating the difference between results of the two minute walk test at inclusion and at 5 weeks.
Time frame: 5 Weeks in average (2 and 8 weeks) after the inclusion in patients in whom the prosthesis will be modified
If a modification of the prosthesis is required and performed on the basis of the first assessment (at inclusion), a new assessment with the modified prosthesis is performed 5 weeks later (from 2 to 8 weeks).
Change of repartition pattern will be assessed by calculating the difference between the variation coefficient before and after the prosthesis modification.
Time frame: At inclusion for all patients
Calculated based on 10 walking trial of 10 meters. Speed, step length of the prosthetic and non-amputated leg and standing time on the prosthetic and non-amputated leg
Time frame: At inclusion for all patients
Calculated based on 4 standing trial of 30 seconds. The calculation is the same as for gait, but the mean pressure during the postural trial will be used instead of the maximal pressure during the step.
Time frame: At baseline
At inclusion (baseline), the measurements of pressure repartition pattern in gait and standing posture tasks will be repeated twice, in order to test inter- and intra-evaluator reproducibility.
Time frame: at baseline
By structured interview, visual analogic pain scale, and clinical examination at the end of the baseline assessment.
University Hospital, Grenoble
Other
Peut-on améliorer la Marche de l'amputé fémoral en Guidant la Correction prothétique Par l'Analyse Des Pressions Dans l'emboîture ?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05803317
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05267639
Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower
Holliston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04937179
Amputation, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05407545
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Wounds and Injuries
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial Details