Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Cangzhou, Hebei, 061001, China
NCT Number: NCT03933228
Compared efficacy of ultrasound-guided combined interscalene-cervical plexus versus combined supraclavicular-cervical plexus block for surgical anesthesia in clavicular fractures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Cangzhou, Hebei, 061001, China
The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided combined interscalene-cervical plexus versus combined supraclavicular-cervical plexus block for surgical anesthesia in clavicular fractures.The hypothesis of this study was that the supraclavicular-cervical plexus block could provide better anesthesia with less anesthesia related complications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ultrasound-Guided Combined Interscalene-Cervical Plexus Block
Ultrasound-Guided Combined Supraclavicular-Cervical Plexus Block
Time frame: At time 15 minutes after the block
Sensory blockade was assessed using the pinprick test at the surgery site
Time frame: At the end of surgery immediately
Number of participants with phrenic nerve palsy
Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Other
Ultrasound-Guided Combined Interscalene-Cervical Plexus Versus Combined Supraclavicular-Cervical Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia in Clavicular Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.