Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01021774

Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the outcome of anal fistula repair with a collagen plug is comparable to that of repair by a mucosal advancement flap.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Akershus University Hospital

Lorenskog, 1478, Norway

About this study

Perianal fistula can occur as a complication to a perianal abscess. A perianal fistula is associated with significant morbidity and reduced quality of life. Anal fistulas seldom heal spontaneously and may require surgical intervention. The main purpose of the operation will be to close the fistula and preserve anal continence. The traditional surgical fistula closing techniques often show disappointing results. Today, a collagen plug for fistula treatment is commercially available. The mounting of this plug is technically easy and less invasive than the traditional closure of the fistula by making a lid of anal mucosa (advancement flap). The purpose of this study is to determine whether the outcome of anal fistula repair with a collagen plug is comparable to that of repair by a mucosal advancement flap, with regard to healing of fistula, anal continence and pain. Plug treatment has so far shown promising results, but prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with fistula involving > 1/3 of the external anal sphincter
  • Single, continuous fistula tract at time of inclusion (implies pre-treatment with seton)
  • Patients with previous fistula surgery can be included (max. 1 lambeau or 1 plug)
  • All patients included must be able to fill in an informed, written consent and to understand its implications and contents and to participate in the follow-up

Exclusion criteria

  • Fistula tract shorter than 2 cm
  • Complex fistula tract system (branching of the fistula tract)
  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV-positivity
  • Fistula caused by malignancy
  • Tuberculosis
  • Hidrosadenitis suppurativa
  • Pilonidal sinus disease
  • No internal fistula opening found
  • Unable/contra indications to go through MRI scanning
  • Crohn´s disease
  • Ulcerative proctitis

Treatment and study plan

Anal fistula treatment

Procedure

A comparison of collagen plug vs advancement flap surgery

Other names: Perianal, Lambeau technique, Anal fistula plug, Fistula, Surgical treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. Anorectal fistula closing rate

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life

    Time frame: 1 year

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Akershus

Other

Collaborators

  • Region Örebro County
  • University Hospital, Linkoeping
  • Uppsala University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug vs Advancement Flap Surgery. A Randomised Prospective Blinded Multi-centre Study

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 30, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 29, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.